Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

Tapping the brakes

First of all, a disclaimer: This sucks. Good. Now that that is out of the way, we can focus on the situation at hand.

While Mizzou entered this season with aspirations for an undefeated regular season, it's time that Mizzou fans face reality: it's not easy to do. Ever since Missouri walked off the Sun Bowl field in El Paso in December of 2006, the Tigers may have been, up until last night, the ONLY team in the country to have avoided losing a game they were supposed to win. Last year, almost no one in the country outside of black and gold thought Mizzou should win in Norman, and even though the Tigers entered the Big 12 Championship as the No. 1 team in the nation, Vegas had the Tigers as underdogs, and in hindsight, justifiably so. You can't find a team in the country last year outside of Hawaii who didn't lose a game they were supposed to win.

You could say Mizzou was overdue. Make no mistake, OSU was a game Mizzou was supposed to win. But this isn't to say Mizzou gave the game away.

OSU flat out beat Missouri last night. The gameplan was great. The players were inspired. The Pokes capitalized on turnovers. They pressured Daniel. Last year in Norman, Mizzou brought its A-game through three quarters before it things got away from them. Saturday, Mizzou was in a dogfight all night, and the offense that had been running like a BMW began running like a Pinto.

While we can talk ad nauseum about Chase Daniel not looking like himself in a falllen man's jersey, this one all starts at the offensive line, but perhaps there is a silver lining. Oklahoma State stunted and speed rushed Mizzou with great effectiveness. Like I noted in the podcast, Mizzou's zone blocking/wide splits/pull-heavy scheme is susceptible against a fast team who times the gaps correctly. OSU did that all night, and Barnes and Madison and others were failing to pick up ends on rollout pull blocks that they'd routinely picked up all year. If anything, their difficulties catching up to faster defensive ends will allow Pinkel and Co. to adjust the schemes before seeing Orakpo and friends in Austin next week.

Although the loss was gut wrenching and the task of winning in Austin still daunting, Texas' win over Oklahoma may have been the best thing to happen to the Mizzou program Saturday. If Texas had been blown out by Oklahoma and Mizzou rebounded in Austin to beat Texas, public opinion would have merely viewed Texas as a mediocre football team. After yesterday's Red River Shootout, if Mizzou beats Texas in Austin, the rebound is official and Mizzou shoots right back into relevancy. 

So, yes, no one wanted to see what transpired last night actually come to fruition. But you can make the case that Mizzou was way overdue, having avoided the "true upset" bug last year. In 2007, Mizzou opened Big 12 play by demolishing Nebraska then losing to a team from Oklahoma. They followed that by throttling the team from Texas, regaining the momentum that carried them to a Big 12 North title. No one should expect that to happen in 2008, but before anyone starts getting gloomy and dark on a quiet Sunday morning, tap the brakes and realize that there's a light at the end of the tunnel as long as Mizzou speeds through the pass undeterred.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

first two possesions made the game

mizzou settles for a FG and osu gets the ball back eventhough they clearly fumbled. Those two plays set the tone and eventually lost the game for the tigers.

if mizzou gets 7 instead of three and then gets that fumble and turns it into seven or 3 osu ends up being the team that only rushes the ball 18 times.

and i can’t believe we only ran the ball 18 freakin times. we averaged 33 runs/game in the previous 5.

i don’t know where our head was at that game. from the three huge plays our defense gave up, to the lollipops that chase was throwing, even the muffed kickoff by mac. something was definitely wrong with our team last night and the one guy who is supposed to take control threw three interceptions.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Oct 12, 2008 3:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Obviously the field goal changed momentum a bit

But I have to disagree with the fans who say that Pinkel electing for the field goal five minutes into the game is what cost Mizzou the game.

As for the running game, I don’t blame Pinkel for abandoning it. There were NO holes for Washington. Daniel was the only running threat Mizzou had all night.

http://www.RockMNation.com
Chance McDanielson for Heisman

by RPT on Oct 12, 2008 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree but...

why didn’t they run Daniel some more?

by CPC on Oct 12, 2008 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a 12-game season

They didn’t want him to be sacrificed like Dez Bryant

http://www.RockMNation.com
Chance McDanielson for Heisman

by RPT on Oct 12, 2008 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

…he was already struggling to get off of the ground at the end of the game. A few more hits, and we might have lost by more.

Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by Bill C. on Oct 12, 2008 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think.....

….Dez’s bell is still ringing.

by Husker_Engineer on Oct 13, 2008 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

there usually aren't any holes the first quarter

but in the second half some draw plays would have been quite effective i think. and having another blocker for chase would have helped. just the threat of running would have helped. they were only rushing four and sometimes three for most of the game.

and as far as the field goal, its defensible. if it would have been 4th and 2 or more i would have agreed. however, 4th and inches…we have to go for that.

when you have a feeling the game will be a shootout you have to also think that settling for field goals wasn’t going to cut it. we needed that killer instinct last night.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Oct 12, 2008 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually...

To refute the “no holes in the first quarter” argument, here’s Washington’s splits through the Nebraska game:

1st: 26 carries, 232 yards, 8.92 YPC, 5 TD (1Q carries in all five games)
2nd: 15 carries, 99 yards, 6.60 YPC, 3 TD (2Q carries in all five games)
3rd: 19 carries, 135 yards, 7.11 YPC, 2 TD (3Q carries in four games)
4th: 7 carries, 34 yards, 4.86 YPC, 0 TD (4Q carries in only two games)

I think Pinkel cut his losses where he had to. OSU deserves a major tip of the cap for plugging holes the way they did. Plus, Pinkel’s faith in Daniel on 95 percent of games during his career has been rewarded. If you asked me whether or not I’d trust Chase guiding us downfield seven yards at a time because the run game has been stuffed, I’d have said absolutely.

http://www.RockMNation.com
Chance McDanielson for Heisman

by RPT on Oct 12, 2008 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree that we were due

And look around the country…at this point, it’s in-style to be an elite team and lose to a lesser opponent. USC did it, Florida did it, Georgia did it (still not ready to buy into Bama), LSU did it (Florida’s good, but I don’t think they’re that good).

All this loss does is confirm, in a kind of dumb way, that we’re just like everyone else. A very good team, yes, but not invincible.

Oh, and it does one more thing, in my opinion. It shows just how tough the Big 12 is going to be this year, week in and week out. I’m sure this isn’t any surprise to us, but with how much dap the SEC gets for being a tough conference from top to bottom, Big 12 teams are having just as much trouble getting through their own conference as the mighty SEC teams. The two teams expected to undefeated (if anyone can be expected to go undefeated) in the Big 12 were Missouri and Oklahoma. I can maybe see Texas running the gauntlet, but I don’t see the Pokes doing it, nor do I see Texas Tech staying undefeated, either, which means we’re not going to have an undefeated champ come out of the conference. Which means good news for Mizzou, who with one loss are still right in the thick of things. If at the end of the season, our worst loss is Oklahoma State, that should be enough to get us into a BCS Bowl, and quite possibly THE BCS Bowl.

by RoyalsFanInBillings on Oct 13, 2008 10:28 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Rock M Nation: a.k.a. Burnt End Nation.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Young_man_small
Some Numbers Perspective
Small
Two Baylor Post-Game Thoughts
Calvin2_small
StL Recruiting Reception Notes
Small
Two Oklahoma Post-Game Thoughts
Sb_-_helmet_small
Message from Haith

Recent FanPosts

Img_1112_small
Rock M Nation's Guide to Columbia (Remix)
Mizzou__1_small
The Magnificent Seven
Small
Reddit for Mizzou Sports
Small
RISE UP MIZZOU FANS
Img_1112_small
Mizzou Moving Day on the WWL
Hatepie_small
OT - Valentines Day Menu - Better get to plannin fella's!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Babyfoot_small Bill C.

Editors

Untitled_small ghtd36

Calvin_20and_20hobbes_small The Beef

Sleepy_small SleepyFloyd7

Zdrock_small ZouDave

Authors

Gupegg_small D-Sing

Small BillCarter

Madjay_small TigerBartender