Crossfire: Northwestern Q&A
This postseason edition of Crossfire allows us the chance to welcome our new friends from Lake the Posts, a veritable one-stop shop for all things Northwestern athletics.
RMN: First of all, what's the reaction been like to Northwestern's 9-win regular season? Did Northwestern fans expect this kind of output this year?
LTP: Extremely positive as you can imagine. I was banging the 8-4 drum all summer long and fellow Big Ten bloggers thought I was delusional. When you consider the injuries we suffered - star RB Tyrell Sutton out, his back-up Omar Conteh out, CJ Bacher out for 2 games - it truly is a remarkable season. The amazing part is most felt we would do it Mizzou style by simply outscoring opponents. We have a new OC with Mick McCall (Bowling Green) and a new DC/Savior with Mike Hankwitz. The offense underdelivered and the "D" overdelivered and essentially made the season. We're just getting used to this whole pass rush concept which was a joke in previous years.
RMN: How have fans reacted to the pairing with Missouri? What's the public perception of Missouri's program right now among Northwestern circles?
LTP: A collective gulp. I'm not going to lie to you, we'd much rather be playing South Carolina in the Outback or even Florida State in the Champs than a pissed off Big 12 team that won it's division in arguably the most dominating year a conference has had in memory. Missouri is very well respected and the speed of Jeremy Maclin combined with the experience of Chase Daniel presents a major challenge. Cats fans are on a mission to erase the "1st time since..." syndrome and the last of those (aside from winning at the Shoe) is winning a bowl game. This is our 6th bowl since 1995, but our last bowl win was in 1949.
Remaining questions after the jump...

RMN: It seems like most Missouri fans know the names Bacher, Kafka, and Sutton and not much else. Who in particular do Missouri fans need to become familiar with before Dec. 29?
LTP: The headliner is DE Corey Wootton. He is a sack machine and menace to all QBs. John Gill at DT is also a stalwart while S Brad Phillips is a ferocious hitter (he's knocked two players, including Big Ten MVP Shonn Greene out of games already this year). CB Sherrick McManis gets all the hype in the secondary, while freshman CB Jordan Mabin is underrated. The LB corps is a little thin thanks to injuries and our offensive line, the big question mark of the year has been a pleasant surprise in the pass rush protection department, but below average in run blocking.
RMN: How exactly is the Bacher-Kafka used? Is it a platoon system, or is Kafka's playing time a result of injuries? How much faith do you have in both guys?
LTP: It has been 100% injury related. Bacher went down with a hammy in the final drive against Indiana. Kafka started and played the next two games, and CJ returned for the final two against Michigan and Illinois. Bacher has been plagued with inconsistency as he is prone to throw picks, but has a new attitude of "I'm putting the team on my back." You can plan on seeing a healthy mix of both - a true platoon in the Alamo - as they are such different looks it will make you prepare essentially for two separate teams. The coaches completely wrap Kafka's throwing, but he showed great promise in the Minnesota game (sans one very bad pick 6). Faith in CJ was at new lows earlier this year, but his recent moxie has lifted many to believe again. Kafka is very well liked, but the lack of passing has caused fans to become irritable on 3rd and long situations.
RMN: What are the strengths of the Northwestern defense? How do you expect them to matchup with the Missouri offense?
LTP: The strength is chemistry. We may not have the most explosive athletes, but they are playing together in a way that we haven't seen since 95 & 96. We are weak against the deep ball to the non McManis side, but are very good at coming up with the big sack and pass rush. All you need to do is watch the game tape against our one common opponent, Illinois, to see what we've become. We do give up the big play a couple of times a game, but our "D" somehow manages to always stiffen and keep teams out of the end zone.
RMN: The blueprint for beating Missouri begins by manhandling Mizzou in the trenches. What kind of success do you expect out of Northwestern's offensive and defensive lines?
LTP: I like our D-line matchup against you, but our O-line, as mentioned is not so good with the run. Perhaps it is wishful Big Ten thinking but I believe the Illini are similar in the challenges you present. A dangerous deep ball threat (from a MUCH better QB than Juice) to stellar, speedy WRs and good hands, good sized TEs. I expect us to really be aggressive and create havoc for Chase, but I'm fearful of the deep ball to Jeremy Maclin. You know it's coming, but can we stop it. Yikes.
Thanks to LTP for the info. Our response to LTP's line of questioning can be found here. Make sure to head over to LTP to interact if you have any questions about NU football, and welcome those NU fans who find their way here to Rock M Nation.
Comments
Damnit.
I like these Northwestern guys. I need a reason to have some sort of ill will toward them, but they even complimented the TruFlair in the comments. I mean…can’t they, like, claim that Norm Stewart was overrated or something? I’m dying for some material.
"Please. What the hell do you know about starting a sports-related website and then deciding to leave it to work on other things and then? How dare you, sir." -- Michael Schur, aka FireJoeMorgan's Ken Tremendous, to Will Leitch
by ghtd36 on
Dec 9, 2008 10:30 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Reasons Not To Like Northwestern (Whatsover Things Are True)
(1)They have a common mascot name…I mean come on, Wildcats? The only thing more common is Tige…scratch that.
(2) They’ve been to only six bowl games since 1995? What kind of lame program are they running over there in Evanston? Why, in the same amount of time, mighty Mizzou has been to the much more impressive total of seve…scratch that.
(3) They’ve only won nine games this season…scratch that.
(4) Get this, they supposedly have one of the “premire” journalism schools in the nation…scratch that.
Hmmm – let’s see…they’re a bunch of intelligent students who put academics first? They excel in the classroom and the community as well as the field? Their long suffering fans have been supportive of the (mostly) down and ups of the program?
I KNOW WHAT IT IS – their originally colors were BLACK & GOLD. They changed to purple. I’m not sure why, but I have a feeling it’s because they hate Missouri. It’s disrespect like this that causes unrest in the masses.
That’s what I’m gonna use…either that or David Schwimmer is an alumni…it’s a push, really.
"Wherever you go, there you are" - Buckaroo Bonzai
by brik on
Dec 9, 2008 8:57 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Things for Mizzou fans to look out for
Of course, they’re not terribly different than what we’re going to be paying attention to.
1) Will Sutton play or not? Our offensive line has not done a great job opening up holes. With Simmons, our third string back, we’re not going to get production on the ground. If Sutton can play for the first time in over two months, that changes everything. McCall likes to have the RB line up out wide or motion out wide from the backfield quite a bit in this no-huddle but not necessarily hurry up offense. In this role, Simmons doesn’t really do much. Sutton, however, is a very dangerous threat to Mizzou as a receiver. He runs tight routes, finds ways to get open, makes catches, and breaks tackles. He can take advantage of having a linebacker cover him. If Sutton can play, not only will we have more success running the ball, but we’ll also have a better passing target on the field. Sutton’s problem, though, is ball control. His surgery was on his left/non-carrying arm, but one would have to believe it could be more of an issue if he plays.
2) How can McCall utilize Kafka? Unlike LTP, I’m not convinced we’re going to really see much of a platoon. As we saw against Illinois, he may come in for a play or two, but I fear that it will only be in a few obvious short yardage run situations. With several weeks to work, can McCall get Bacher and Kafka on the field at the same time if Sutton can’t go? That’s likely most Northwestern fans’ dream right now.
3) Will Vince Browne return? Browne isn’t going to get the coverage that Sutton will, but our defensive line is still somewhat thin due to injuries and his return from his own injury could really help things out.
and possibly the most important
4) Will CJ have good luck or bad? As LTP mentioned, Bacher has tried to put the team on his back the last two games. He has taken on more of a gunslinger mentality and isn’t afraid of taking risks. For the most part, those risks have paid off (see the 2nd TD against Illinois when he threw back into the middle of the field just under the goal posts to Ross Lane). But as we saw against Indiana, there are times when they turn disastrous.
by NUCubs on
Dec 10, 2008 3:24 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for stopping by
Great info.
One of my colleagues posted the season highlight video for Northwestern, and although I knew that Sutton was a good back, I didn’t realize how perfect of a fit he is for that offense. He adds a completely different dimension to that unit.
Oh, and Kafka and Bacher on the field at the same time?

http://www.RockMNation.com
Home of "Thrust Nunchuk Upward"
by rptgwb on
Dec 10, 2008 5:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sutton and this offense
Tyrell really is a good fit for McCall’s spread. Before this year, we haven’t really been able to consistently take advantage of his receiving skills. This offense utilizes those skills, though when Sutton isn’t in there, all sending a RB out wide does is take a linebacker or extra DB out of the box. Nothing else. And it’s kind of frustrating when we could easily send out another WR.
As for Bacher and Kafka, it’s probably more of a fantasy than anything we’ll actually see. And if Sutton is out there, there isn’t a need for it. But especially with Kafka on turf, what a fantasy it is…
by NUCubs on
Dec 10, 2008 7:30 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs














