Five Burning Questions, Week 1
Week one of college football is upon us, after what seems like the longest offseason in recent memory. Obviously, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of questions entering this season in the Big XII, but I'm going to boil it down to the five questions that are most pressing in the conference.
Cool? Cool.
Question 1: Can the Big XII nouveau riche keep up with the traditional Big XII powers?
It is widely accepted that OU is the class of the conference, and rightly so. Not only do they have one of the most talented teams in the conference, but they have arguably the best coach in college football (yeah, I said it, big whoop, wanna fight about it?) and a favorable schedule (true road games are Washington, Baylor, K-State, A&M and Okie State).
Texas, like it or not, is Texas. You can mark them for at least nine wins every year, and they will very rarely get outclassed. There are some doubts this year, but this program is going to be legitimate this, and every, year.
But two of the traditional Big XII powerhouses figure to struggle this season. Both Nebraska and Texas A&M are installing new coaches, and don't appear poised to be anything more than also-rans in their respective divisions.
In their place, three traditional also-rans are considered the top tier of the conference. Kansas, coming off a historic season, return many of the important players from last year's team. Texas Tech, in case you haven't heard, have 21 of 22 starters returning, including two Heisman hopefuls in Graham Harrell and Michael Crabtree. And we all know about Missouri.
But now, the time for hype is over. It's put up or shut up time for the Big XII nouveau riche. Can Kansas prove that it is more than just a soft schedule and an efficient quarterback? Can Texas Tech get over the hump with arguably its most talented team ever? Can Missouri shake the reputation of an underachieving program when the target is on its back?
OU and UT will be there. Who will join them?

Question 2: Which Big XII QB will fall flat on his face?
Chase Daniel. Sam Bradford. Colt McCoy. Graham Harrell. Todd Reesing. Zac Robinson. Josh Freeman. Stephen McGee. Kirby Freeman. Joe Ganz. Cody Hawkins. [Insert ISU quarterback here].
Regardless of your affiliation, you have to admit that the Big XII has a very impressive class of QBs. But they can't all live up to expectations, and at least one is going to fall flat on his face.
Freeman is in a new system and plays at Baylor, so he is primed for failure. ISU's QB will be playing for ISU, and will be starting his first game. Stephen McGee, I maintain, is the most overrated player in the conference. Josh Freeman hasn't lived up to expectations, and has to show me something before I believe that he is for real. Ganz, while his numbers were impressive last season, feasted on some pretty bad defenses, and has to prove that he can do it against a tough team. Put Hawkins in the same category as Freeman.
That leaves what I believe to be the real class of the Big XII: Daniel, Bradford, McCoy, Harrell, Reesing and Robinson. Someone's falling flat on their face. The easy bet is Robinson, since he only has half-a-season of experience. But the sexy wager is on someone like Reesing or McCoy.
Question 3: Who is actually going to play defense this year?
This is an offense-heavy conference, there is no doubt about it. But who is going to step up on the other side of the ball?
Oklahoma, obviously. Kansas, most probably. Missouri, most probably. Texas, most probably. Texas Tech, if they have a prayer of living up to expectations. Baylor, quite possibly.
Who's not going to play defense? Nebraska, regardless of eight months of Pelini. Kansas State, regardless of having an entire junior college on the roster. Texas A&M, regardless of how "successful" Mike Sherman was in the NFL. Oklahoma State, which has to be frustrating for Cowboys fans. Colorado, unless they make a quantam leap. Iowa State, because the defensive genius of Chizik needs time to marinate.
Question 4: What no-name player will become a household name by season's end?
This conference has superstars on both sides of the ball. Names like Daniel, Maclin, Lucky, Bradford, Robinson, Harrell, Crabtree, Goodson, McCoy, Scott (presumably), Bradford, English, Murray, Reesing, Freeman. It's loaded. So who's going to sneak up on us?
Jordan Lake, the safety from Baylor. Cyrus Gray, the running back from Texas A&M. Marquis Hamilton, the wide receiver from Iowa State. Deon Murphy, the wide receiver from Kansas State. Among many others.
Question 5: Who is out of contention before the season starts?
It's hard to count anyone out before the season even begins, but I think it's safe to say that there are three teams that simply won't be contending for the conference (or their division) title this season.
Baylor. Despite the fact that I love the Art Briles hire and they have a defensive playmaker, it's simply not happening for the Bears. Sic 'em, 3-9 record.
Iowa State. Chizik will get this program back to prominence. It will happen. He's too smart. But not this year.
Texas A&M. Dennis Franchione left that program in shambles, and despite a relatively talented offensive backfield (McGee [ugh], Goodson, Lane, Gray as a spell back), who is going to play defense for the Aggies? I don't care how big and loud your stadium gets: if you can't stop anyone, you can't win games. And if you can't win games, you can't contend for a title.
Enjoy week one. Rock, flag and eagle.
0 recs |
20
comments
Comments
Holy crap!
Promotion to the main page?
I MADE IT!

"One man, five scoops." -- shroomer
by ghtd36 on Aug 25, 2008 8:14 PM CDT 0 recs
whatever you do...
…don’t get a big head.




http://www.rockmnation.com
Thrust nunchuk upward!
by The Boy on
Aug 25, 2008 8:19 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Was the Giada reference necessary?
Yeah, so I admit I love the Food Network.
Deal with it.
http://www.RockMNation.com
Chance McDanielson for Heisman
by rptgwb on
Aug 25, 2008 9:03 PM CDT
up
0 recs
This guy hates you.

For the record, I like Food Network in doses, but it is totally getting away from its roots. Giada, while hot, is someone I don’t trust, and I hope Rachael Ray dies in a fire. I think Food Network really jumped the shark when it did away with “Iron Chef” and went to “Iron Chef America.” That is a travesty.
Alton Brown, though? Total badass.
"One man, five scoops." -- shroomer
by ghtd36 on
Aug 25, 2008 9:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Diners, Drive-in, and Dives
… is the greatest show in American history that doesn’t feature Charlie Kelly
http://www.RockMNation.com
Chance McDanielson for Heisman
by rptgwb on
Aug 25, 2008 9:22 PM CDT
up
0 recs
UGH.
RPT, please, c’mon, don’t soil this high regard in which I hold you (sentence inversion so as not to end in a preposition, FTW!).
Guy Fieri is a perfect example of what is wrong with Food Network. He makes the culinary aspect completely secondary. He’s a big idiot who spikes his hair and brings “edge” to Food Network. He’s not a great chef. I’d argue he’s barely an above average chef. He’s there for edge. Period. Just like Giada is there for eye candy, and Rachael Ray is there to bring in the Oprah crowd.
While Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives is interesting, it’s completely counterintuitive to what Food Network is about: becoming a better cook. Provide expertise, not entertainment.
Mario Batali, Bobby Flay, Emeril Lagasse (kinda). Those are the great chefs on Food Network. Guy Fieri needs to join Rachael Ray in that fire.
"One man, five scoops." -- shroomer
by ghtd36 on
Aug 25, 2008 9:35 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Food Network
You’re forgetting the best part of that channel: Alton Brown.
Everything that man touches is great (Good Eats, Iron Chef America, Feasting on Asphalt). Plus he called the Donut Drive-In in South City St. Louis (which I have been to several times) the best donut place in America, an honor it deserves.
It's a funny name.
by Turd Ferguson on
Aug 25, 2008 11:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
And you know what I am now?
A total idiot for not looking under the picture. Carry on, and Ace of Cakes is decent.
It's a funny name.
by Turd Ferguson on
Aug 25, 2008 11:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm extremely anti-Ace of Cakes
And I have no issues with all the Brown love. I’m sure we can get MCBoomofDoom in here to spit out some love for Good Eats.
http://www.RockMNation.com
Chance McDanielson for Heisman
by rptgwb on
Aug 25, 2008 11:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
By the way
This derailed faster than a Rock M Roundtable.
Congrats, Boy.
http://www.RockMNation.com
Chance McDanielson for Heisman
by rptgwb on
Aug 25, 2008 11:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
My epic response:
This is about my third draft, because each time I was writing, I got that pop up saying someone else had commented. So I had to stop and check. But here, in full, is my interpretation of the Food Network and what its truly about: Entertainment. That is why you have that spawn of satan/no talent ass clown, Rachel Ray. For some unknown reason, that bitch has a significant % of the population under her control. She cant cook at all. She will add some pre-packaged bullshit to complete a meal. She sucks. But she is energetic and not french. She probably would not be so bad if she was not so incredibly unwatchable. Her voice, the words she uses, so damn annoying. While she gets my most scathing criticism and I hope she gets the worst judgement in hell, I love Guy Fieri. DDD is an awesome show, it reminds me that there are good places to eat ever where, you just have to look. It promotes regional specific resaurants, not mega-chain ones. I dont care if he can cook, because he is just there to reiterate what I already know, that pulled pork sandwich is indeed as awesome as it looks on my TV. His cooking show is not bad, he has one annoying quirk (going to the fridge and calling it "shopping") but I overall would probably eat what he makes or even try making it myself. I can also stand his show, because he does not use a completely different vocabulary that then rest of the world like Ray does. (EVOO? seriously?) I could go on and on, but the facts, as I see them, are this: Rachel Ray fucking blows, Guy Fieri was made for DDD, maybe not so much his own studio show. Also, I am a huge fan of Anthony Bourdain, but he can hate a little too much. But thats for another response. As is the enormous man crush I have on Alton Brown. My brother refers to AB as my boyfriend. Its that bad. But that is all for now.
Hating all things Spartan and Boston College related since '93
by mcboomofdoom on
Aug 26, 2008 12:06 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Guy
Any show that forces me to watch another man eat (other than the Hot Dog contest on the 4th of july) is an abomination to nature.
Every time I flip by DDD, that dude is shoving something down his greasy pie-hole. Regardless of how good the food looks, he ruins it by talking with his mouth full. “mmmffffmff, thafffts awffffffome! give me a pound! oopfs, I got gravy on my wristband!”
rediculous. That’s not good eats.
by SleepyFloyd7 on
Aug 26, 2008 10:32 AM CDT
up
0 recs
holy crap...
…who knew everybody had such strong opinions on the Food Network??

For the record…
- Alton Brown = phenomenal. And apparently someone about whom males apparently feel okay revealing man-crushes.
- Guy Fieri = everything that’s right with Food Network. Loves really good food. DDD rules.
- Rachael Ray = evil, but only about 60% of Oprah’s evil
- Ace of Cakes = relatively entertaining.
- Giada = GIANT FREAKING NOGGIN’.
http://www.rockmnation.com
Thrust nunchuk upward!
by The Boy on Aug 26, 2008 6:13 AM CDT 0 recs
I posted this on rpt's Facebook wall last night while the site was down.
You and I are simply going to completely and totally disagree as to the purpose of Food Network. If it is your opinion that Food Network’s purpose is “making you realize how hungry you are,” then I can understand why you are satisfied with Fieri: he brings you exactly what you want.
It is my opinion that Food Network’s purpose is to further the art of cooking and to provide expertise in the culinary field. Food Network (again, in my opinion) was created to be a network of cooking shows. Show me how to cook. Show me tricks to become a better cook. It’s the same way with ESPN. Do you watch to “make you realize how much you love sports”? Or do you go there hoping to find expertise in the field of sports?
My knock on Fieri is not that he is “edgy”. My knock on Fieri is that he is only “edgy”. He is all flair and no substance. And no offense to your cooking (which I’m sure is wonderful), but recipes for jerk chicken, marinated flank steak and garlic rosemary mashed potatoes are a dime a dozen.
It’s not about cookie cutter guys. Mario Batali is a classically trained chef. Bobby Flay is a classically trained chef. Emeril Lagasse (who I am meh on) is a classically trained chef. I want expertise when I watch Food Network. I don’t want a Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management from UNLV when I watch Food Network.
Putting Guy Fieri on Food Network is the equivalent of putting a beer league softball coach on Baseball Tonight. Yeah, he knows what he’s doing and he probably won’t make a complete ass of himself, but where is the expertise? Why should I listen to him? Because he’s entertaining? Well, entertainment is one thing, but only if there is substance to back it up. Come to think of it, Guy Fieri is John Kruk.
The bottom line is that Food Network has taken quantum leaps backwards over the past couple years. Rachael Ray. Giada De Laurintis. Sandra Lee. Guy Fieri. The Neelys. The travesty that is Iron Chef America. I don’t give a crap. I want you to show me expertise in the kitchen. If I want to be entertained with no substance to back it up, I’ll watch Fox News.
"One man, five scoops." -- shroomer
by ghtd36 on
Aug 26, 2008 11:23 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I need to clarify
I kept most of the last response on the point that Guy Fieri was good. But now I think it is you that is holding something against the Food Network and that is unfair. The Food Network most certainly started out as all cooking shows all the time. It was once about instruction and improving skills in the kitchen. But it damn near went under. So they changed philosophies and went another route. It was a desperate move, but in times of need drastic measures are taken. (I almost quoted Dark Knight here, but decided not to) They flipped to more entertainment and shows that would have a wider appeal. Thats why there are shows like Unwrapped/30 Minute Meals.
It also does not help that Emeril became famous. The FN execs saw that and wanted more like him. Thats how the hellspawn Rachel Ray got an opportunity. Thats why the core beliefs of Food Network were abandoned years ago. And they are never coming back. There still are plenty of shows on the network that do show you tricks to become better, but a large number of those involve Alton Brown.
Real Quick: As for Batali, his show was the shit, but it got canceled. It was like a Rick Steves Europe episode blended with a cooking show, it was so good.
I think the problem you have with the Food Network is that you expect too much of it. If you truly want classically trained chefs, there are certainly plenty to choose from on TV. Wolfgang Puck sometimes is on the Home Shopping Network. So is Todd English. I saw on PBS once a show from Johnson and Wales, a cooking school on the East Coast. Has the Food Network taken a couple of steps back recently? Yes, but thats because the general public does not want serious instruction, they want to learn shortcuts to the finished product. I agree that the Food Network has taken some steps backward, but it was because America does not want where it was headed. Not everyone wants to go to culinary school. But I think you should join me in pretending that shows like Rachel Ray’s, Sandra Lee’s and Iron Chef America do not exist. If you want expertise in the kitchen watch Alton, Bobby Flay (if you can stand him), Tyler Florence. There is substance on Food Network, you just have to look for it. And then ignore the rest.
Hating all things Spartan and Boston College related since '93
by mcboomofdoom on Aug 26, 2008 5:56 PM CDT 0 recs
And that's what I do.
I don’t want to say that Food Network is all bad. It’s not. Like I said, I enjoy the hell out of Alton Brown, Bobby Flay, Mario Batali, Emeril Lagasse (in doses) and even guys like Tyler Florence. And I do simply ignore the other stuff.
I’m not saying I don’t understand why Food Network is doing what it’s doing: because it sells. Big time. I was only commenting on how it represents a significant move away from its roots. That’s all.
"One man, five scoops." -- shroomer
by ghtd36 on
Aug 26, 2008 6:06 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I think we can all agree on one thing:
Sandra Lee sucks the worst.
http://www.rockmnation.com
Thrust nunchuk upward!
by The Boy on
Aug 26, 2008 8:24 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Oh sweet God, yeah.
“Well, today we’re going to make a german chocolate cake! So grab your german chocolate cake mix…”
She will be used to light the fire in which Rachael Ray dies.
"One man, five scoops." -- shroomer
by ghtd36 on
Aug 26, 2008 8:35 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I only ever watch ever now and again, and only Paula Dean
“Hey ya’ll…today we are going to fry butter in butter with some butter sauce.”
and I would probably eat that too…
"Write a wise saying and your name will live forever." - Anonymous
by The Beef on
Aug 27, 2008 7:10 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I
agree. I wish I could have some funny animated graphic here, but I dont know how to do that.
Hating all things Spartan and Boston College related since '93
by mcboomofdoom on Aug 26, 2008 6:54 PM CDT 0 recs











