I really like Leo in a reserve role
I know it's not FanPostFriday, but I'll go ahead and post one a day early.
I really like having Leo come off the bench and there are a bunch of reasons why I feel this way.
No. 1, while Ramsey isn't the consistent scoring threat that Leo is, Ramsey provides excellent energy. He's always moving, sometimes to his own detriment, but he's a very active player. Again, he doesn't always know what he's doing out there and has a tendency to take a bad shot/get out of control here or there, but he's a very energetic player. And that's something that the whole team can feed off of. In fact, with Ramsey, Tiller and Carroll in the starting lineup, the rest of the team basically has to play with energy just to keep up with those three. So that's why I like Ramsey in the starting lineup.
Secondly, with Leo coming off the bench, he can provide a quick scoring punch inside, coupled with Goose's outside burst of scoring. But the beauty of him coming off the bench is that if he's playing the Good Leo role, he can stay out there as long as he wants and play a lot of his minutes against either a somewhat tired starting big man or a reserve big man who's probably not as talented as the starter.
What's more is that if we're getting Bad Leo, then his poor energy/demeanor hopefully won't sap his teammates as much because it's five minutes into the game. And you can also just go ahead and cut his minutes shorter if he's Bad Leo because Bowers is developing into a legitimate fifth "big" man (and based on the rotation last night, he might have passed Safford in that regard ... either way, both Bowers and Safford are going to give you more energy than Bad Leo ... and will likely be just as effective on the offensive end as Bad Leo as well).
Finally, there's the fact that you're keeping Good Leo out of foul trouble by not starting him. I don't have any stats to back this up, but how many minutes of Good Leo have we been robbed of over the last couple years because of ticky-tack fouls?
I'm not as enamored with having Kim English in the starting lineup and would actually prefer Marcus "Hack-a-Shaq" Denmon in the starting lineup. But I'm certainly open for debate on that issue.
FanPosts may be posted by any RMN member and may not reflect the views of the management staff of Rock M Nation or SB Nation.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As long as Ramsey continues producing as a starter...
…I love Leo coming off the bench. It’s a lot harder to prepare for Leo if you have no idea how much he’s going to play. Opponents have to prepare for DeMarre and Tiller/Taylor as the main threats in the lineup, and then Leo and Goose come off the bench. It gives the starting lineup an Anderson-like identity with a bunch of hustle guys out there, and then some major scoring punch comes off the bench.
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
The only problem with the starting lineup as is ...
… like you say, is that you need to get production from Ramsey and Taylor to keep pace with the other teams’ starters. Relying on Ramsey and Taylor is an iffy proposition at best. But I do think that each of them are finding their respective games a little bit.
Though can we please put the kibosh on Ramsey and Taylor shooting threes? I know each of them don’t shoot a horrible percentage, but it’s Fool’s Gold at best. I think the deal I’d make with Ramsey is that I’m going to temporarily red light him on three-pointers. Once he gets his FT average up to 60 percent, then he can get that green light back again.
Was once caught putting at night ... with the 15-year old daughter of the dean
by mitch cumstein on Jan 22, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions
oh come now...
…my favorite player ever (Mark Adkins) was better at 3’s than FT’s…no reason why Ramsey can’t follow that model. :-)
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by 















