Mizzou-Nebraska: A Pure Football Rivalry

When I was combing through resources for some of the Mizzou Football History posts I wrote this summer, I stumbled across a wonderful resource in the Missourian archive. The years are spotty--the majority of the papers are from between 1966 and 1985; but the archive also contains the entire year of 1929 as well. Poring through the papers from the fall of 1929, I found one of the coolest, most enlightening series of articles and pictures I've ever seen. It was the week of October 21-25. The stock market was about to crash. But there was not much mention of any financial issues--no, the Missourian's focus, particularly on October 24 (the day of the initial crash), was on the Missouri-Nebraska game.
Among the two schools has sprung a rivalry that is threatening to overtake in the hearts of Missourians the annual grudge fight with the Jayhawks of Kansas.
...
While the ancient Bearg-Henry rivalry is gone, a new one looms up between the Tiger head and the new Cornhusker chief which promises to be just as fierce and bloody. either one would chuckle with consummate pleasure to start off the siege with a victory. Henry would like to give the vast gathering of visitors, who are expected to furnish the noise-making assistance for his charges on Homecoming, their complete money's worth, while Bible cherishes the dream of wiring back to the homefolks Perry's famous message. The tussle is certain to develop into General Sherman's definition for hell.
While Coach Ernie Bearg has departed from the Nebraska institution, in his place has come the wonder man of the south, Dana X. Bible, recognized as one of the brainiest mentors in the profession.
...
When the two elevens meet upon the gridiron it will be no mere struggle between physical strength, as both chieftans are master minds at tricks and versatile playing. Hiterhto, the contest between the two teams was one of sheer physical power against a lighter but more versatile eleven. But now both teams are of behemoth type and the Husker mentor is skilled in the art of versatility. Thus all of the ingredients for a great battle between skill and brawn combined in each opposing lineup are present.
A glance through the dope pages since the inauguration of the conquests shows Nebraska has a decided edge. For fifteen of the twenty-two contests, the Cornhuskers have ended the game with practically everything but the soiled jerseys of their rivals. But since Coach Gwinn Henry's regime in the Bengal camp, they have experienced hard sledding. Twice they have won, but three times they have been turned back. One other has ended with no advantage.
I love the Border War, Missouri's rivalry with Kansas. I wouldn't trade it for anything. Few rivalries in this country can literally claim to have ties in the Civil War. Ancestors of Kansas fans killed ancestors of Missouri fans, and vice versa. It is a rivalry with intensity, history, and bitterness. It is a personal rivalry that bleeds into sports.
Missouri-Nebraska, on the other hand, is a football rivalry. (And yes, no matter what Nebraska fans might tell themselves, it is indeed a rivalry.) It springs from Missouri and Nebraska coaches hating each other, Missouri and Nebraska players hating each other, and of course, Missouri and Nebraska fans hating each other. There is no war history between these two schools, only football. And football's enough.
For over a century, Nebraska has more-or-less been a measuring stick for Missouri's progress as a program. Pick any season from the 1900s or 2000s, and if the question is, "Was it a good season for Missouri?" the fastest way to find an answer is to look at the result of the Nebraska game. Not the Kansas game, not the conference standings, not any bowl game. If the Tigers beat the Huskers, it was probably a pretty good season.
Just look at some of the ten seasons I wrote about this summer:
1939: good season.
Nebraska came to town hoping to further their cause for a potential national title. Instead, they got run off the field (or, if you prefer, passed out of the stadium). Nebraska was ready for a steady dose of Christman's arm--instead, in front of 18,000 Tiger fans, they got Christman's and Bill Cunningham's legs. Mizzou ran to set up the pass, and it worked beautifully. Christman only completed four passes in the first half--for 116 yards and three touchdowns. From the Nebraska 20, he completed a pass to Bud Orf, who fumbled...and his brother Bob scooped it up for the touchdown. After NU tied the score at 6-6, Christman found Bob Orf, intentionally this time, for a 60-yard bomb. Up 13-7 in the second quarter, one play after he had scrambled for a 28-yard gain, Paul rolled left, then threw right, pitching to a wide-open Stillman Rouse for a 20-yard touchdown to put Mizzou up 20-6 at halftime.
Here's a reminder: Nebraska was really, really good in 1939. After getting whooped by Missouri, they would go on to plow through Kansas, Pittsburgh (in Pennsylvania), and OU to wrap up an otherwise perfect season. But Mizzou ran (and threw) roughshod over them. NU could only manage a couple of scoring drives, and they just could not get the ball away from the Tigers.
This was a major step forward for Mizzou. Not only was it their first ever win over a ranked team (the AP had begun ranking teams in 1936), but after a few games of just getting by on offense--nine points against K-State, none against Iowa State with Christman at QB (they did put up 21 with the backup)--Mizzou was cocky and assertive against the Huskers. It was a good time for the pieces to come together, as the schedule wasn't going to get any easier.
1957: pretty good season.
Oct. 25, 1957 - A group of pranksters changed the rock "M" to an "N" the night before the Missouri-Nebraska game. But the Mizzou groundskeeper, with the help of some young boys who gained free admission to the game in exchange for their assistance, restored the "M" to its proper form before kickoff. The next day, Missouri used a last-minute touchdown to post a come-from-behind 14-13 win over the Huskers.
1965: solid season...but still a bit disappointing.
Suddenly a flag fluttered to the ground, and the referee stepped off 15 yards against Missouri for unsportsmanlike conduct.
...
Word from the field was that Missouri tri-captain Bruce Van Dyke had cursed an official. The press box, envisioning pier-six language to cap what had been a bruising, pier-six brawl of a game, imagined the most personal and pointed of vulgarities.
...
"Gosh," [Van Dyke] said [at the MU Varsity-Alumni game in 1974], "that official made absolutely no allowance for the tempo of the game. I did not curse him or anyone. On the short-yardage situation we tried so hard to keep the ballcarrier from falling forward. When there was a slow whistle and then a measurement that showed Nebraska had made it, I said, 'Oh, bull...'"
...
In the end, the penalty may have made the difference. NU gained eight yards in three plays, and instead of facing a field goal from the 24, they faced one from the 9. NU kicker Larry Wachholtz atoned for his missed PAT by banging home the chip shot, and NU took a 16-14 lead with under 6:00 remaining, then held on for the exhausting win.
1972: Yeah, they rebounded from 1-10 and went to a bowl, but...
And then the third quarter happened. Six minutes in--after a quick TD drive, a great punt return by Johnny Rodgers, and an interception of Cherry--it was 42-0. Then 48-0. Then, with NU's backups in, 55-0. And finally 62-0. NU's starters came out midway through the third quarter, but Mizzou just kept handing them the ball. Husker quarterback David Humm completed 15 passes for 267 yards, NU rushed for (only!) 215 yards, and Mizzou's incompetent offense kept handing them short fields. Bad, bad, bad. Mizzou was now 2-3 with two more games versus Top 10 teams to go. Next up: a trip to South Bend.
1978: 8-4? Don't care--it was a great effing season.
- Wilder literally shoves a tackler aside, pounds ahead into the endzone (Grass: "WILDER!" Roe: "WILDER!" Grass: "JIM WILDER!" Roe and Grass: unintelligble loud noises. Roe: "DID YOU SEE THAT?? DID YOU SEE HIM?? DID YOU SEE HIM TAKE THAT MAN AND THROW HIM DOWN?? Grass: "You will not believe what Wilder did." Roe: "He had a guy wrapped around his waist, he just grabbed hold of him and threw him into the ground like he was a piece of turf!" Grass: "Unbelievable!")
...
Some of the best games ever have been decided by a 35-31 tally. OU-NU 1971. Super Bowl XIII (Pittsburgh-Dallas). The score suggests a blow-for-blow game rather than one of crazy plays and weird scoring lines. Sure enough, there have been crazier games just in the three seasons we've now covered in this series (1965: Mizzou 20, Florida 18...1984: Wisconsin 35, Mizzou 34), but none better. This was a well-executed game with the big players making big plays, and Mizzou, traveling to the den of the #2 team in the country in nearly sub-zero temperatures, was simply the better team.
A loss like this one is hard to take. For Tom Osborne, who came just one or two plays short in his quest for the national title game, the loss (and the pressure of living up to the standards that Bob Devaney set) almost sent him running to a new location.

Even though Missouri's 1980s-1990s bowl drought was technically only 13 seasons (1984-96), Missouri did not see itself as having truly broken through to quality football again until they beat Nebraska in 2003. (All due 1997 disclaimers aside, of course.)

The Missouri-Nebraska rivalry is in an interesting place right now. After twenty-four straight wins over Missouri, Nebraska's fans naturally started to get a bit of a wandering eye. The huge battles with OU in the 1970s and 1980s made them the #1 rival, and then beaten-down stepbrother Colorado started using Nebraska's style of play to win a ton of games, beating NU in 1989 on their way to a near-national title, then beating them again in 1990 on their way to a true (controversial, ahem) national title. For most of the 1990s, NU and CU played tight games (that Nebraska always won) before Colorado crushed them in 2001, bringing rise to the Huskers-Buffaloes rivalry. But Colorado has been down for a while now, and OU-NU only takes place two of every four years. Now after seeing other people, Nebraska and Missouri have gotten back together again, and all of those feelings from the past are bubbling up again.
Missouri-Nebraska has a history that other rivalries do not have. NU and Oklahoma were just beginning to play each other in the 1920s when Mizzou was fighting the Huskers annually for conference titles. NU and MU went 3-3-3 versus each other in that decade with Nebraska winning five conference titles, Missouri three. Frank Carideo ran Missouri's program into the ground in the early-1930s, and Nebraska went 8-2 versus the Tigers in that decade. However, in 1938, Paul Christman's Tigers upset Nebraska in Lincoln, kick-starting a long Missouri domination of the rivalry. Mizzou would win 13 of 16 battles between 1938 and 1953 (NU and CU didn't even start playing each other regularly until the late-1940s, and this rivalry had already seen a couple of dramatic momentum swings), and after a short losing streak, would win another six in a row from 1957 to 1962. Even when Nebraska hired Bob Devaney, Missouri remained quite competitive, and overall, despite losing streaks of four (1963-66) and three (1970-72), Missouri would go 13-9 against Nebraska from Frank Broyles' first (and only) season in 1957 through Warren Powers' first season in 1978.

And as we all know, after Mizzou's epic win in Lincoln in 1978, the rivalry...stopped being a rivalry for a while. NU ripped off 24 straight wins against the Tigers. At first the rivalry remained relatively competitive--five of NU's ten wins from 1979-88 were decided by a touchdown or less. But as Woody Widenhofer gave way to Bob Stull, then Larry Smith, the defeats turned into outright embarassments. The average score from 1989 to 1996: Nebraska 52, Missouri 10.

Naturally, 24 straight wins takes the starch out of a rivalry, and as mentioned above, NU fans stopped considering Mizzou a rival.
Well guess what: Missouri's a rival again. Starting in 2003, Missouri has won four of six, and the series is tied at 4-4 in this decade. The winner of Missouri-Nebraska has won the last three North division titles, and the two teams are very much in the hunt to make it a fourth straight year this season (though Kansas might have something to say about that). Nebraska fans can try to convince themselves that they still have the superior program, but if they do, Missouri will just have to keep right on beating them until they start to think otherwise. And until Nebraska treats this like the rivalry that it is, Missouri will probably do just that. Nebraska still may be Missouri's measuring stick, but Missouri is becoming Nebraska's as well.



Clearly Thursday night's game is huge in just about every sense--it's a battle of ranked teams, it's got serious division title repercussions, etc. The loser of Thursday night's game will struggle to catch back up in the North title race. But even without any build-up, Missouri-Nebraska is still Missouri-Nebraska. Missouri-Nebraska is and has always been the Bearg-Henry feud. Christman's guarantee. Faurot's dominance. Rearranging the M on the hill. Bruce Van Dyke's curse words. Epic Devaney-Devine battles. Epic Osborne-Onofrio (and Osborne-Powers) battles. Wilder's stiff-arm. Randy Jostes knocking Turner Gill unconscious. Dale Klein's seven field goals. Matt F***ing Davison. Ben Davidson. Eric Crouch. Brad Smith. Chase Daniel. The gold rush.

Mizzou fans have been raging against Nebraska's air of arrogance for over a century now, and while the coaches are a bit more politically correct these days (Gary Pinkel is "very impressed" with Nebraska, while Bo Pelini thinks Missouri is "here to stay"), let's just say that no pep talk will be needed tomorrow night. Due to football and football alone, Missouri-Nebraska is a game that needs no introduction, no added motivation, no nothing. This is a rivalry that fills the air, particularly in Columbia, where Mizzou can never completely make up for the damage done in the past but will never stop trying. The teams will run onto the field, the gold will fill the stands, the ESPN cameras will roll, and nobody will have any doubt whatsoever what this game and this rivalry mean to everybody involved.
It's on.

65 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's hard to blame them...
…they have won one of the last seven North titles…it’s hard to argue with a record like that.
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
We have met the enemy, and it is us
It’s interesting, over all the Big 8/Big 12 pastings that Nebraska has handed Mizzou down the years, you would think I would literally hate them, on par or even more so than Kansas.
But, in all honesty, it’s not that way. Don’t get me wrong, I want to beat Nebraska every time I see their lousy helmet on the field with every fiber of my being. But there is no hatred, no “I’m gonna drink until I forget about this game” if we lose factor like when Mizzou loses to the Jayhawks.
Like Bill said, it’s purely football. Damn good stuff.
"Wherever you go, there you are" - Buckaroo Bonzai
not sure how old you are
but I was born in 1980. I was nearly in college by the time Nebraska kicked for a touchdown in 1997. When Missouri finally won in 2003, I was already a veteran of a foreign war. I hate Nebraska nearly as much as I hate Kansas. We were their whipping boys…the Iowa State of those days, because even they were better than Missouri. We were the game they circled as a win during training camp.
Good writing. I like the guys over at Corn Nation, but I really hate their school. I hope Nebraska goes into a football tailspin that makes them the whipping boys of the Big 12 for the next 20 years.
Also...
Dave, I know you claim that your 05 Indy Bowl video is your crown jewel, but there’s no way that the 97/03 Anthology video isn’t in the discussion.
Agreed.
It was great from the moment I found that Monk chanting version of the song. Like as soon as I heard that song, I had the whole video done in my head.
It’s one of my favorites, no doubt. That the 05 Indy Bowl has the advantage of being set to just EPIC music, and the timing on it is perfect the way the music crescendos exactly when we get that 100-yard INT return TD.
Those 2, plus the Texas Tech 06 game, are my 3 favorites. And of course the kansas 06 game with the “Ride With the Devil” intro. That was fun to do. Whenever we play (and win) at kansas again, I’ll have to throw in video from “The Day After” to show Lawrence getting nuked.
by ZouDave on Oct 6, 2009 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
May have mentioned this before...
but the Flea Kicker was the first time I dropped the F-word in front of my mom. I was 15.
/still as pathetic
Great article...
That got me even more pumped for the game, if that was possible. And yes, I was 8 years old and cried at the end of the flea kicker game. Props to you, Bill.
Great write up Bill....I gots the chillz
Though I despise KU for everything they do, I can actually talk to a KU fan about sports and the respective programs.
You just can’t talk to a NU fan. Reasoning with an NU fan or discussing sports is like talking to a 5 year old ADD kid on crack, that is sitting in front of a both of fireworks, keys, and recorders.
Let the jokesssss……….begin!
Parkour!
Sponsor of the Will Ebner Physical Therapy Center for Players Who've Been Hit By Will Ebner and Want to Try to Stop the Ringing. Or WEPTCPWBHBWEWTSR for short.
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Oct 6, 2009 11:01 AM CDT reply actions
wow, just once I wish I could spell, just once *booth
Sponsor of the Will Ebner Physical Therapy Center for Players Who've Been Hit By Will Ebner and Want to Try to Stop the Ringing. Or WEPTCPWBHBWEWTSR for short.
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Oct 6, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
Grrrrhhhhhh
Why can’t the game be today?
This is a wonderful piece of writing. You really should quit your day job.
"You get a lot of national exposure like that" Weatherspoon said. "Lot of people out there not really talking about the Tigers. . . . .You've got to go out there and get respect if you want it."
by tigers and chiefs fan on Oct 6, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions
Sorry I don't see it, not yet anyway.
I still think it’s a 1 way rivalry. It’s building up again to be a great rivalry but it’s not there yet.
When have the NU losses hurt NU? They really haven’t. The 2003 season was odd, NU won 10 games and I still think thankfully, fired Solich. The loss to KSU was worse that year. In 06 Missouri could have taken NU out of the B12 North race, but didn’t (this is the Chase eats a booger game), in 2007 NU got rocked by MU, but everyone destroyed NU that year (except KSU- ha). Last year MU was playing great and again blew out Nebraska, but NU was still finding it’s identity under a first year coach, and that loss didn’t really hurt them that much, NU went on to the Gator Bowl and won 9 games.
I know you all HATE Nebraska, but you know what, so does everyone else.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
greatest fans in the world......
go you
Respect and honor your opponent, unless that opponent is a fictional bird. In which case you hit him until he falls, kick him until dead and burn the remains.
Um ok thanks
You got anything else to add?
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
Nothing that your own douchebaggery hasn't already
Good luck Thursday.
Respect and honor your opponent, unless that opponent is a fictional bird. In which case you hit him until he falls, kick him until dead and burn the remains.
You mean last year didn't hurt?
You know…preventing you from a north title and all?
But hey…thanks for proving others’ points about NU fans…
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
by Bill C. on Oct 6, 2009 12:07 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
So my 1 opinion speaks for all Husker fans?
Wow didn’t know I had that power.
NU really shouldn’t have won the North last year. You telling me that if MU needed to beat KU with the North on the line they couldn’t?
We didn’t know after that game that NU was even going to be in a position to win the North. Hell after that game MU looked like it could be going the National Championship.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
so you're saying mizzou beating almighty nebraska in 08 means they were good enough to play in the national championship?
"The field mouse is fast but the owl sees at night"
Yes that's exactly what I was saying... um, no.
Missouri was ranked what then? In the top 5? I thought they were the next week when they played OSU… Anyway they were playing great football then and looked like they could/could contend. I remember Whitlock had an article about it. It was a great win for you guys, broke the streak and everything.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation

"You get a lot of national exposure like that" Weatherspoon said. "Lot of people out there not really talking about the Tigers. . . . .You've got to go out there and get respect if you want it."
by tigers and chiefs fan on Oct 6, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Out of curiosity...
Your logic is “When have the NU losses hurt NU?”
By contrast, when did MU losses hurt MU? Keeping us from 4-win seasons in the 80s?
by RPT on Oct 6, 2009 2:20 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
But I'm not saying MU is NU's rival
Not yet anyway.
Thanks exactly the point. I’m saying that the lack of “hurting” games is one reason it’s not a true rivalry yet. You get a few years where NU takes MU out of the B12 title game, or the other way around and yeah we’ll be on our way.
The only way NU accepts this as a rivalry is if/when NU AND MU rise up to the level that NU fans want to be at. And that’s consistently playing for the B12 title and BCS games. Neither team is there yet. If MU and NU can become like Texas and OU in the south then I think NU fans will finally accept a new rival.
Until then NU fan will continue to meh (is this a verb?) your advances. For one, It’s fun, as you guys get all fired up about it, and secondly NU has been disappointing before, see the forced upon rivalry of NU/CU, the advances at various times of ISU, and KSU.
And you know what? I’d love a true rival. I’m 31, and have never known a true rivalry game for NU. (OU was bad at the end of the B8, and then the rivalry was destroyed by the B12 formation).
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
This might be the most passive aggressive post I have read this week.
And that’s saying something.
It’s fun, as you guys get all fired up about it
So those are Mizzou people over on your boards “posing” as NU fans?
I think that there is one team on your schedule that you would love to beat more than any other. A win over “Mizzery” would prove to you that you are back, that Bo has begun to reclaim the heritage that Nebraska earned over generations in the midwest.
A Loss, on the other hand, might show that you have more ground to make up in the North. It might show that Gary Pinkel has used his head-start to effectively build a team that just might keep you from ever-luvin’ dominance.
That sounds like a rival to me.
I think you are merely trying to emotionally insulate yourself in case the unthinkable happens on Thursday night.
Bring a poncho.
The sleeper has awoken. . .awakened. . .he woke up.
We would love to beat Oklahoma
Beating them would be sweeter. Ask any NU fan.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
...and next year, when you don't play OU?
Do you just take a pass on caring about a specific game again until 2012?
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
Pass-
I dunno, maybe Texas then? I hate Texas.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
Importance is not at the heart of rivalry
Otherwise, the MU/KU football hatred would have died off a LONG time ago.
And, as for you insinuating that only Missouri fans get fired up about the rivalry talk, I suggest you peruse your own archives at Corn Nation, wherein Corn Blight had this to say before last year’s game:
Missouri has hated us for years, it’s time we return the favor. Stay in denial if you want, but if Missouri beats us this weekend, I’m ready to call them a rival. I’m moving on with my life, perhaps it’s time you do the same.
When it comes to it not being a rivalry, it sounds like your colleague needs as much convincing as we do.
by RPT on Oct 6, 2009 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Weatherspoon says otherwise-
On whether Mizzou/Nebraska is a true rivalry:
“I really don’t think of it as a big rivalry. It’s been a fun game, when we go up there it’s a nice atmosphere and when they come down here it’s a crazy atmosphere like I’ve never seen at our stadium. It’s more like a fun game to me than a rivalry.”
http://www.mutigers.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/100409aae.html
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
I thought this column summed up my feelings well
Shatel: Mizzou rivalry ready to boil over
Ready to boil over, just needs some more heat.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
Did you even read that article?
Obviously not the last sentence.
The Nebraska-Missouri rivalry has finally arrived.
I'm with William Quantrill. Go Missouri, beat Kansas.
I can't help but read your sig
I notice that KU is mentioned, but NU is not.
Anyway I don’t share his conclusion, just is results and discussion. I just don’t think we’re there yet.
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
I know I should stop feeding the troll
But surely you’ve heard of a red herring argument? Whether or not I hate Kansas has nothing to do with Nebraska. There is plenty of hate for both. Even more so now than before. My sig refers to a favorite shirt of mine, referring to the Civil War origin of the Border War.
You’ve offered plenty of opinion here, but have in fact accomplished nothing other than cementing that this is important – why seek it out if it’s a non-issue? If you were really so confident in the historic grandiosity of the Cornhuskers making you superior to a rivalry with Mizzou, you wouldn’t need the validation of our argument.
I guess, in short, what I’m saying is shut your damn mouth and get off our boards if you’ve got nothing worthwhile to say.
I'm with William Quantrill. Go Missouri, beat Kansas.
I have to defend both of you here.
While you make your points validly in the first two paragraphs, that third paragraph is uncalled for.
I don’t agree with what JLew has to say, but as long as he’s not being incredibly incendiary or racist/sexist/homophobic/etc., he has a right to say all this. One of the reasons we started RMN is to be able to foster conversation between different viewpoints and not deal with the “LOL, F***** NUB, GET OFF OUR DAMN BOARD” sentiment.
wow. Jlew you are SOOOOO arrogant. it makes me want to throw up.
“thanks exactly the point” what the hell does that even mean?
"The field mouse is fast but the owl sees at night"
Typo-
Call the grammar police if you want. I wish they had an edit button.
Should say “that’s exactly the point.”
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
I'm just saying that taking a person with poor grammar seriously is very difficult.
"The field mouse is fast but the owl sees at night"
maybe the reason everyone beat the sh*t out of nebraska
in 07 in because we totally demoralized you in columbia.
"The field mouse is fast but the owl sees at night"
It didn't hurt
You can't possibly be a scientist if you mind people thinking that you're a fool.
~Wanko the Sane
Big Red Kool-aid Drinker @ Corn Nation
Well, J
It must be nice to be so even keeled. Maybe you should teach a course to sports fans everywhere on how to remain so detached. You could maybe start Friday morning in Lincoln.
I bet this one might sting a little.
The sleeper has awoken. . .awakened. . .he woke up.
Best Wishes to Missouri
Very good piece of writing! Big time Husker fan here. Born and raised in Nebraska. I certainly do want Nebraska to win on Thursday. However, I do realize that Missouri has an excellent team and strong show of support from their fans. It will be tough to pull off a win in Columbia. What I don’t understand is the use of words like “hate” and dropping the “f” word when talking about the other team’s players, fans, etc. I regularly travel to Missouri and like the people and places. Columbia is a very nice town. I wish Missouri well on Thursday night in what will be a great game to watch. I’m pumped, too. Just like many of you I get very emotional when watching these games. But to use words like “hate” toward fellow U.S. citizens is a sad commentary on our society. Remember, you’re talking about a game. Perhaps I’m more sensitive because I just spent 5 days in Washington D.C. seeing a lot of great sights. After touring the Holocaust Museum one gets a true understanding of what “hate” is all about. And it really should have no place in a relatively meaningless conversation about football and football fans. Best wishes to Missouri and its fans on Thursday.
I don't think hate and cursing is unique to any one fanbase...
…I know a) we got cursed at by a 70-year old couple when Mizzou took the lead on Nebraska back in ’98 (we had the audacity to stand up and cheer), and b) I heard plenty of f-bombs at the Mizzou-BGSU game a few weeks ago. :-)
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
I hit "Post" before I intended...
…anyway, the point was that cursing is pretty universal, and I’m pretty casual with the word “hate.” There’s a sports hatred involved, not a “World War II” hatred. The end!
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
agree
I agree that bad language is found in every fan base…and your implication is that it make’s it okay since “everyone else” does it? Why not be the one that has the self discipline to cheer your team on without explitives?… and the one who has the restraint to not drop the “f” bomb when talking about another teams players. Most people have a lot more respect for fans who are passionate about their team…without the explitives.
"sports fans" and "self-discipline" are not usually tied together...
…and I don’t drop f-bombs at sporting events (at least, not anymore), so I really shouldn’t be the one answering this, I guess.
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
I drop truckloads of expletives at sporting events, especially the dreaded F-BOMB
And I hate nebraska.
I also feel like my colorful use of English as called forth by the fiery dedication I have to my team has very little to do with me as an actual person except to say that I am loyal to the things I care about, and I don’t particularly care to watch my language around anyone but my grandmother or small children.
Cheers!
Ok so....
us saying I hate (insert your favorite opponent of the week/their respective fan base) is similar in relation to Hitlers’ Germany and the senseless extermination of thousands? Not entirely buying that point.
I agree with your points that during games you don’t need to curse out other fans, that is retarded. I don’t, my friends don’t, and I haven’t seen that in awhile actually.
However this is on a blog.
So I will retire with this; every fan base is going to have people that will react to things poorly, every fan base will have people yelling things that 0-10 year old kids probably shouldn’t hear on a regular basis, and….every fan base will have blogs with people typing words with a little more fervor than spoken word. How else can you portray your intended sense of feeling over the internet? This does not make us fascist Hitlers.
Sponsor of the Will Ebner Physical Therapy Center for Players Who've Been Hit By Will Ebner and Want to Try to Stop the Ringing. Or WEPTCPWBHBWEWTSR for short.
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Oct 6, 2009 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't think that's the claim that's being levied.
I think it’s more just a sense of perspective that can sometimes be very welcomed.
by RPT on Oct 6, 2009 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions
I know everyone gets sensitive and more understanding
after going to the holocaust museum ( this exact thing happened to me) but this is a sports blog. cursing happens
"The field mouse is fast but the owl sees at night"
I'm not allowed to say I hate Nebraska or Kansas?
F that.
by bleigh82 on Oct 6, 2009 3:34 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
Effing well played sir
Sponsor of the Will Ebner Physical Therapy Center for Players Who've Been Hit By Will Ebner and Want to Try to Stop the Ringing. Or WEPTCPWBHBWEWTSR for short.
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Oct 6, 2009 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Well.
This escalated quickly.
What do tigers dream of when they take a little tiger snooze? Do they dream of mauling zebras, or Halle Berry in her Catwoman suit?
RABLE RABLE RABLE RABLE
Sponsor of the Will Ebner Physical Therapy Center for Players Who've Been Hit By Will Ebner and Want to Try to Stop the Ringing. Or WEPTCPWBHBWEWTSR for short.
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Oct 6, 2009 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Does it really surprise anyone
that the average Nebraska fan would not want to admit that we have a rivalry? Why “restart” a rivalry when the non-rival has had the upper hand in recent years, and it appears that they might be developing a lasting program?
It’d be like me restarting a rivalry I had in middle school where I used to beat the hell out of some kid, but now he’s 6’3" 240 whereas I have remained 5’9" 135. Or we’re close to the same size now, anyway.
by kevinf on Oct 6, 2009 4:17 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I would say that we are rivals
Traditional conference rivals that is. I however, would not say that NU/MU is anywhere the level of rivalry that we had with OU before the Big XII was formed. Over the past 6 to 7 years though, I suppose MU has probably been our top divisional rival. You guys have a solid program now, and should be proud of that, but really the only reason you continue to say that the two schools are rivals is because NU played big brother for so long and now you want us to call you equals. I’m not saying that you guys aren’t every bit as good as we are this year or haven’t been just as good the past 6 or 7 years. I’m just saying lets not rush into this rivalry, Lets just take it slow, feel it out, and wait to see how we feel about each other in say another 5 to 10 years.
Wait...hold on a second
You think we were “just as good” as Nebraska for the past 6 or 7 years?
You guys have won 1 division crown in the last 7 years. We’ve won 2 of the last 2.
We’ve beaten you 4 times in the last 6 (or 7) years. We’ve outscored you by 104 points in those 4 wins.
How can you even say with a straight face that we’ve been “just as good” as you for the past 6 or 7 years? I think it’s CLEARLY obvious that in the past 6 or 7 years Missouri has been the better program. It’s really not even up for debate. Just like it’s not remotely up for debate if you go back to before 2003.
dammit
I missed this whole thing.
shit.
I mean wood peckers.
which is different than woodpeckers.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by 




























