Spring Football Update: Offensive Line
The switch has been flipped from basketball to football, and I figure the best way to dip our toes back in the water is to revisit my 2009 Walkthrough series from January and see what has or hasn't changed since then. We move now to the hosses up front.
Offensive Line

We've talked a lot in this series so far about what a brand, spanking new QB needs to be successful--solid running back (check), go-to receiving option on third downs (check), and now, a rock solid offensive line. Check. Missouri has to replace Ryan Madison and Colin Brown in the starting lineup, but it's impossible not to be excited about the prospects of guys like Dan Hoch, Austin Wuebbels, Jayson Palmgren, etc. Missouri could be set at both tackle positions for the next three years, they have a potentially great center, and while the guard position isn't quite as hammered-out, this looks to be the best offensive line in the North Division. And as good as this line is in 2009, it should be even better in 2010.
What's Changed? Nothing, and in the best possible way. Gregory is the rock-solid leader of the group, Fisher and Barnes are looking like strong returning starters, and Hoch and Wuebbels have solidified their starting positions.
Spring is very easy to over-interpret. You want to get excited that a given player or unit is doing well, but then you remember that they're doing well against another Mizzou unit, which is bad. You want to see both the offense and defense shining in a given moment, while at the end of the day, they basically fought to a draw. That's what it appears is happening with the OL and DL right now, and I couldn't be happier. In one article, you read that the defensive ends have been borderline unblockable in the spring, and then you read that the offensive line beat the defensive line in one-on-one drills.
It really is hard to overstate how big an underrated a great OL could be for this offense in 2009. For any offense, really. Ask Sam Bradford how important a great OL can be--if he doesn't know the answer now, he will in the fall, when an entirely new unit is trying to protect him after three seasons of basically the same personnel and continuity. Ask Clemson how an iffy OL can make your season very quickly fall apart.
Blaine Gabbert has looked pretty good thus far in the spring, and you read a lot about how he's able to buy time and sidestep pressure to make plays. But if he's not having to sidestep pressure that often when the real games start, if he has time to make some plays against Illinois and Nevada in the non-conference slate in September, then the expectations for this team could very quickly rise.
And as I mentioned in January, not only could this be a rock-solid O-line in 2009 (I still see it as the best in the North)...it will almost certainly be even better in 2010.
Expected Spring Finish - First String
LT - Elvis Fisher (So)
LG - Austin Wuebbels (So)
C - Tim Barnes (Jr)
RG - Kurtis Gregory (Sr)
RT - Dan Hoch (So)
Expected Spring Finish - Second String
LT - Taylor Davis (RSFr) or Mike Prince (Jr)
LG - Jayson Palmgren (So)
C - J.T. Beasley (So)
RG - Travis Ruth (RSFr)
RT - Daniel Jenkins (RSFr)
So we've taken another look at the offense as a whole now, and the youth and talent are pretty ridiculous. Two sophomores and two freshmen fighting it out on the QB depth chart. A junior (D-Wash) and sophomore (Moore) hogging the spotlight at RB. Two injured seniors (Danario, Perry) hoping to get back on the field and scrap to hold onto their starting jobs at WR as a host of youth (Jackson, Kemp, McGaffie, Woodland, Gerau) gets their footing. Two sophomores (Jones, Egnew) with a strangelhold on the tight end position for the next three seasons. And now, one senior on the two-deep at OL, with Chris Freeman, Jack Meiners and others waiting to break into the rotation a year from now. I'm excited about 2009--there has been plenty of encouraging news about how this team could look--but it's impossible not to keep the eyes from wandering toward 2010-11. This program is built for the long-haul.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We're...
going to be the surprise of the season I think. I think we can hold our own against Illinois. Maybe not win it, but at least play well. I think we could very easily defend our Big 12 North title. Kansas’ defense isn’t going to stop anyone and I have no faith in Todd Reesing. The only team I worry about is Nebraska and their Defense. Other than that I really think we could win the North.
We won't be explosive enough offensively...
…to go 7-1 or 6-2 or anything like that. But with KU’s schedule and NU’s offensive holes, 5-3 could possibly win the North, and Mizzou could certainly go 5-3 with good line play and good quarterbacking. It will take a little bit of luck, but it certainly isn’t out of the realm of possibility.
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
Completely agree.
The thing is to make sure that we get the right five wins for tiebreaker’s sake.
by RPT on Apr 8, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Reesing ...
… as much as I hate to admit it, Reesing is the ONLY thing that scares me about kansas. He makes plays when everything breaks down. Their receivers, running game and defense is nothing special, but he can make some plays out of the pocket (or even in the pocket avoiding the rush … last play of the Mizzou game as a case in point).
Reesing is truly the only advantage that kansas has over us, in my opinion (and no, I don’t think Mango is that much better a coach than GP … he might be slightly better, but I think the whole Mangino owns Pinkel concept that is thrown out there in the media or tigerboard is bunk … Mangino is a good coach, but so is GP).
Was once caught putting at night ... with the 15-year old daughter of the dean
by mitch cumstein on Apr 8, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Their receivers are pretty damn good...
…especially when it comes to getting open when Reesing is out of the pocket. He works very well with Briscoe and Meier, and they’re pretty solid even when a play isn’t broken down. I do agree that their running game is only okay, and I’m not sure how good their O-Line is going to be, but they’re strong at QB and WR.
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
Aye
Reesing is maturing a lot. It pains me to say it, but he is a lot like Chase in his demeanor (gotta go throw up now)….
I'm the guy that keeps Mr. Death in his pocket.
Reesing is less robotic than Chase was at the end of his career ...
… Chase was the best anyone has ever been at running the system and knowing what to do with his first couple of reads. But Chase wasn’t the best at improvising (’Nario’s TD catch in the Armageddon at Arrowhead, notwithstanding)
Was once caught putting at night ... with the 15-year old daughter of the dean
by mitch cumstein on Apr 8, 2009 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree, their receivers are fine ....
… but my point is that Reesing’s uncanny playmaking ability makes them better than what they really are (Briscoe’s incredible catch against UT notwithstanding). Their system is pretty good, but we have a good system too.
My boss’ son is a former QB at kU. He told me that their receivers have specific in-play responsibilities as well as broken-play responsibilities on every play. So when Reesing breaks the pocket, they’re almost running a play within a play. That would make it pretty damn tough to defend.
Was once caught putting at night ... with the 15-year old daughter of the dean
by mitch cumstein on Apr 8, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Let's try to remember your last sentence ...
… if we start out 2-2 or something like that (the Illinois and Nevada games are certainly lose-able … very winnable too, but I’ll be far from shocked if we drop one or both of those games).
If we don’t have a great season next year (baseline for me is a bowl bid of any kind … anything past that is gravy … anything less than that is disappointing, but not necessarily cause for alarm), then we just need to remember our youth and focus on the future.
I’m excited for 2010 and 2011, no doubt. But I’m also excited to see what some of these young kids can do next fall as well.
Was once caught putting at night ... with the 15-year old daughter of the dean
I'd be pretty surprised with 0-2 in those games...
…but 1-1 is probably to be expected. And yeah, the optimist in me will be disappointed if we don’t at least make a solid threat for the North title, but in the end building toward ‘10 and ’11 is probably as or more important, and as long as we make a bowl game and show well for the future, I’ll be happy.
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
I concur
I think that this next year, even with a win at either Illinois or Nevada, the expectations will be tempered somewhat. However, as each of these posts are telling us, the future is bright. In looking at the possibility of maintaining the 4/5 first squad line for two years, and (knock on wood) healthy, I would not hesitate to think Mizzou good run the table in 2011
I'm the guy that keeps Mr. Death in his pocket.

by 





























