Kansas State: Beyond the Box Score
Confused? Catch up with the BTBS Primer.
I've fallen behind this week already, so we'll make this short. I said most of what I wanted to say in yesterday's diary anyway.
Mizzou 38, Kansas State 28
|
||||||
| Mizzou | KSU | Mizzou | KSU | |||
| Close % | 87.1% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
| Field Position % | 53.2% | 40.0% | Success Rate | 42.1% | 35.0% | |
| Leverage % | 69.4% | 71.4% | PPP | 0.77 | 0.44 | |
| S&P | 1.187 | 0.787 | ||||
| TOTAL | ||||||
| EqPts | 28.3 | 22.5 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
| Close Success Rate | 49.1% | 38.3% | Success Rate | 51.2% | 46.0% | |
| Close PPP | 0.45 | 0.29 | PPP | 0.32 | 0.27 | |
| Close S&P | 0.943 | 0.674 | S&P | 0.831 | 0.734 | |
| RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
| EqPts | 15.9 | 9.7 | Number | 1 | 4 | |
| Close Success Rate | 51.6% | 38.2% | Turnover Pts | 4.8 | 15.0 | |
| Close PPP | 0.49 | 0.24 | Turnover Pts Margin | +10.2 | -10.2 | |
| Close S&P | 1.004 | 0.622 | ||||
| Line Yards/carry | 4.34 | 2.84 | Q1 S&P | 0.905 | 0.740 | |
| Q2 S&P | 1.376 | 0.935 | ||||
| PASSING | Q3 S&P | 0.652 | 0.203 | |||
| EqPts | 12.4 | 12.7 | Q4 S&P | 0.777 | 0.996 | |
| Close Success Rate | 45.8% | 38.5% | ||||
| Close PPP | 0.41 | 0.36 | 1st Down S&P | 0.815 | 0.695 | |
| Close S&P | 0.865 | 0.742 | 2nd Down S&P | 1.065 | 0.526 | |
| SD/PD Sack Rate | 5.6% / 10.0% | 13.3%/13.3% | 3rd Down S&P | 1.153 | 1.065 | |
| Projected Pt. Margin: Mizzou +16.0 | Actual Pt. Margin: Mizzou +10 |
||||||
Missouri outgained Kansas State by 6.2 EqPts on the ground, and Kansas State outgained Mizzou by 0.3 EqPts through the air. Just what everybody expected, right? Tell me again why I spend so much time previewing these games?
The Offense Bounces Back
As I somewhat expected, the Mizzou offense bounced back on Saturday. It truly does appear that the bigger chip Blaine Gabbert carries on his shoulder, the better he plays. Mizzou was steady and well-rounded in the passing game, with over a 40% success rate and greater than 0.40 PPP, but they won this game on the ground.
For the most part, Mizzou is clearly a team that wins and loses based on its quarterback's right arm, but there is no denying how much the Mizzou running game has steadily improved since the Colorado game. Here are the numbers for Mizzou's four-headed running back platoon in conference play:
- vs Colorado: 18 carries, 51 yards
- vs Texas A&M: 20 carries, 77 yards, 1 TD
- vs Oklahoma: 30 carries, 149 yards, 1 TD
- vs Nebraska: 12 carries, 68 yards, 1 TD
- vs Texas Tech: 21 carries, 227 yards, 2 TD
- vs Kansas State: 16 carries, 83 yards
Mix in a healthy amount of Gabbert and jet sweeps to the receivers, and by the end of the game, Mizzou had taken complete and total advantage of the weak Kansas State run defense. Blaine Gabbert missed a 200-100 game by just 11 passing yards.
Stop Proving Me Wrong, Mizzou
I have staked a good portion of my Football Outsiders reputation on the idea that the concept of standard downs and passing downs (and Leverage%) gives us what we think we get from third down conversions. And to an extent, Mizzou has proven me correct -- at times in 2010, Mizzou has been terrible on third downs (on both sides of the ball, really), yet here they stand at 8-2. But still ... this game was a blowout waiting to happen, but the Mizzou defense continuously let K-State off the hook on third downs. Passing downs too, to an extent, but mostly just third downs of all shapes and sizes. In the end, I guess it doesn't really matter -- both the Mizzou offense (ninth) and the Mizzou defense (26th and fading) still rate well in the S&P+ measure, and Mizzou remains ranked 12th in overall S&P+ because of it.
Targets and Catches
Here is the target-and-catch data from Saturday. It's nice seeing these numbers in the 60+% range again, isn't it?
| Player | Targets | Catches | Catch% | Target% | Rec. Yds. | Yds. Per Target |
| T.J. Moe | 8 | 5 | 62.5% | 30.8% | 36 | 4.5 |
| Michael Egnew | 6 | 5 | 83.3% | 23.1% | 55 | 9.2 |
| Jerrell Jackson | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 15.4% | 45 | 11.3 |
| Rolandis Woodland | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 7.7% | 51 | 25.5 |
| Wes Kemp | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 11.5% | 17 | 5.7 |
| De'Vion Moore | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 3.8% | 4 | 4.0 |
| N/A | 2 | 0 | N/A | N/A | 0 | N/A |
| TOTAL | 26 | 17 | 65.4% | 100.0% | 208 | 8.0 |
| TOTAL (WR) | 17 | 11 | 64.7% | 65.4% | 149 | 8.8 |
| TOTAL (RB) | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 3.8% | 4 | 4.0 |
| TOTAL (TE) | 6 | 5 | 83.3% | 23.1% | 55 | 9.2 |
I will cut Wes Kemp some slack here -- one of the passes "targeting" him was the double-covered, overthrown pass T.J. Moe shouldn't have thrown. The other was a dart thrown behind him. He made a tough over-the-middle catch to boot. In all, the nine passes thrown at Kemp, Jerrell Jackson and Rolandis Woodland went for six completions and 113 yards, continuing a season-long trend: when these three (mostly two, really) guys produce, Mizzou simply does not lose. I was hoping to see more work for Marcus Lucas, obviously, but since Woodland caught the bomb, I won't grouse too much about that.
Summary
I'll just use this space to echo something The Beef said on Sunday. (I know how shocking it is that we would agree on something.)
I am still of the opinion that our biggest concern as a program is THAT we win a game. However, there seems to be (and this is from exposure to other MU sites this morning) a growing number of people who appear to on another step (and I can only assume it is the "next" step, but maybe not even), and have moved on to being primarily concerned about HOW we win. For me, this leads to the possibility you dwell on two losses while neither enjoying nor giving credit for the eight wins, but I can see the other (potential) side of this argument with its relation to our program taking the next step.
There was certainly a lot of negative sentiment around the Internets on Sunday, complaining that we didn't win this game by enough, or ... you know ... all but challenging our defense's and defensive coordinator's manhood. But look around the country. Oregon almost lost to California. TCU almost lost to San Diego State. Stanford almost lost to Arizona State. Nebraska beat Kansas by 17, which is like almost losing to them. Iffy results happen everywhere.
There's a reason why the locker room celebration after every win -- any win -- is so joyous and intense. Every win is a blessing and should be celebrated as such. Mizzou completely lost focus in the fourth quarter, and the defense is clearly starting to show some leaks (which is what you would expect considering the injuries). At this point, just keep winning. If Mizzou beats Iowa State by 1, Kansas by 1 and Random Bowl Opponent by 1, you know what? I'll be thrilled. Stressed, but thrilled. You should be too. Don't nitpick the good moments -- and seasons -- to death until they're not good anymore. Be happy when you can, because you're not guaranteed more happy moments in the future.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well, this was a refreshing change of pace:
3rd Down S&P — 1.15
RockMNation.com (@rockmnation on Twitter)
The 2010 Missouri Football Preview - Available Now!
Yeah, he got lit up a couple of times.
Have you bought your 2010 Missouri Football Preview yet??
Rock M Nation
I'm on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/billconnelly1
The blip in the Links section this morning
really gave me pause.
The 2010 Tigers have already earned distinction, as they are just the 13th team in Mizzou Football history with 8 regular-season wins.
13th?
It’s an amazing time to be a Tiger.
Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova
by tigers and chiefs fan on Nov 16, 2010 1:08 PM CST reply actions
Agree it's a great time to be a Tiger
but it’s worth remembering that 8 wins was a much tougher number to reach back in the day of ten or eleven game schedules, legit non-conference schedules, limited bowl games, and ties.
by Professor Chaos on Nov 16, 2010 1:21 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks for that piece of info :)
Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova
by tigers and chiefs fan on Nov 16, 2010 1:55 PM CST up reply actions
There was another article that brought that up
but, it also pointed out that there have very few seasons in which we have only had 2 or fewer losses. If longer seasons make for more wins, they also make for more losses.
Seasons with 2 or fewer losses:
2007 (12-2)
1969 (9-2)
1965 (8-2-1)
1962 (8-1-2)
1961 (7-2-1)
1960 (10-1)
1941 (8-2)
1939 (8-2)
1936 (6-2-1)
1929 (5-2-1)
1927 (7-2)
1926 (5-1-2)
1925 (6-1-1)
1924 (7-2) –
1921 (6-2) – (5 wins vs 1A competition)
1920 (7-1) – (5 wins vs 1A competition)
1919 (5-1-2) – (4 wins vs 1A competition)
1916 (6-1-1) – (5 wins vs 1A competition)
1913 (7-1) – (5 wins vs 1A competition)
1910 (4-2-2) – (2 wins vs 1A competition)
1909 (7-0-1) – (4 wins vs 1A competition)
1908 (6-2) – (3 wins vs 1A competition)
1907 (7-2) – (2 wins vs 1A competition)
1906 (5-2-1) – (1 win vs 1A competition)
Great to be a Tiger fan!
I agree that many fans seem to loose sense of where we’ve been and where we’re going. It would seem that MOST people would not have expected the Tigers to win 8+ games this year and finish a close 2nd in the North (most likely) as well as beat OU for the first time in 12 years!! At times I get angry too when I see the offense play so poorly against a sub-par team (Texas Tech) but you have to keep your perspective. This team only gets better next year AND the continual exposure in the top 25, in bowl games and on TV helps bolster our recruiting for these kind of results to continue. We are working toward a NC team and our time is coming!! Go TIGERS!!!
STM Loss!
I think a lot of people are either too young to remember or just forget that we were lucky to win 3 games through the Widenhofer & Stull eras (say about 15 years!). /Why did only 61K of our Mizzou fans show up for Senior Day? I was surprised we didn’t sell out the stadium with this years team results and the last home game of the year. We need to rep for our team & our State better on those kinds of opportunities. (and no I didn’t make it either so I have some guilt here)
Seems odd that we have about the same number of EqPts for passing and yet beat them in every single component of it (success rate, PPP, S&P)
They passed quite a bit while the game had fallen out of "close" status.
That explains a bit of it.
Have you bought your 2010 Missouri Football Preview yet??
Rock M Nation
I'm on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/billconnelly1
I haven't been around forever . . .
. . . but it sometimes seems like it. Nevertheless, I cannot remember any other time that I have been as excited about Mizzou sports the way I have the past three years.
Mizzou has always had a winner in one sport or another, but never in my fanhood have we had the success across the board the way we have the last half of this decade.
If I die tomorrow, I want a Mizzou Tiger on my tombstone with a smiley face underneath it, accompanied by the tribute: This Tiger went out happy!
Thanks for the good work, Bill – and thanks to you and The Beef for the good word regarding counting our blessings.

by 



































