Epilogue 2010, or "Why TigerBartender Is Grumpy Sometimes".
Back in October, during the GameDay run-up, I wrote a positive little thing that seemed to garner some praise and sparked some decent discussion. A couple of other times later on in the football schedule I sat down to do it again, and never felt comfortable with where I was going with it, or the sentiment contained within. Ctrl A. Delete.
So, as a kind of post mortem for 2010, I humbly submit another attempt.
So, it happened. I try to avoid it as much as possible, and my job allows me plenty of distractions to keep me un-focused on any particular sports-chump-of-the-moment. But it was halftime of the Insight Bowl and I wasn't behind the bar, and a guy at the table near where I was sitting was absolutely skewering Gabbert & Pinkel with all the naive, conventional wisdom, banal group-think that RMN struggles valiantly to avoid.
The INT in the end zone. Down a touchdown. Pinkel can't win a bowl game. Gabbert sucks, why, even Brad Smith was better, maybe even, what was that guy's name, Kobe, Corby, yeah he was better, too. Obviously Chase was the best. Typical Missouri. What a sucky bowl. I hope Gabbert leaves, but he's not getting drafted. Defense can't stop anybody.
With my best Clint Eastwood stare-into-the-sun-even-though-its-not-in-my-eyes look, I slowly turned and summoned my inner RMN Jedi. I destroyed this kid. Slowly. Methodically. Point by painful point. Logically. I walked him through the program, the ups and downs. The stats, the lineups, no fullback, Darius Outlaw, Kirk Farmer, the competition,. Pinkel and Christensen's fateful no-hudddle, we're running the spread, damn-the-torpedos decision. The recruiting. The draft picks, what it takes to succeed on Sundays, and Chase vs. Brad vs. Blaine. The wins. (And yes, the losses, too.) Why "this next guy after Gabbert" shouldn't have started at Tech. Every answer I coaxed out of him was contradictory to his previous ranting at the table. He conceded, and I pounced. He conceded, and I moved on to the next wrongful assumption. He conceded and back-tracked some more.
I felt good. I was positive and my fanhood was shiny and purring. The Tiger-ness was staggering.That INT should have been a TD after a successful drive. Iowa is not a second half team. Yost learned from last year, and it showed on that last drive: Take what they're giving you. The defense will hawk the ball, given the chance. They have no depth, we'll wear 'em down. Let's go, Tigers.
However. Everyone at the table was staring at me, and the kid seemed pretty embarrassed. Some other tables nearby had leaned over to listen and gape. Silence. More silence.
I realized that I had become the OTHER tail of the bell-curve. The lunatic fringe of sanity. So prepared, and so rational as to be the killjoy. One of his friends said, "Well, I guess he pretty much just showed you." Even more silence. Damn. I sighed and turned back to the TV for the second half.
All of this was followed up with the tedious hour of discussing the "BS" dropped pass replay reversal. Sure, it stinks. But with the help of some RMN-author/contributor tweets, I even deflected and managed to instill some sanity into that (albeit, drunken) discussion. The sober, rational killjoy.
Every fanbase is hungry. I get it. Every fanbase wants their team to succeed. And every fanbase has their favorite (and not so favorite) memories and former players.I get that, too. But now, I backtrack. I concede my point. The Mizzou fanbase, while seemingly admirable in the glaring spotlight of national GameDay exposure, has reverted and regressed. There are no shades of gray. There is no articulate debate. Its "ether we win a national championship this year, or fire the coach, they're all bums". We can't be "just successful ENOUGH" for the general populous of Mizzou fans to be happy.
And now, I feel like that kid. Missouri fans: Thanks. "I guess you pretty much just showed me."
p.s. The first living breathing human being to even stray in this same direction in regards to the Tiger Basketball program or CMA, will lose two of those adjectives. RMN Sith Lord.
p.p.s. I'm sorry to that table. I doubt (based on your preconceived notions and lack of introspection about the program you call yourselves fans of) that any of you come here, but in general, throwing it out to the fates and the powers that be: I'm sorry.
FanPosts may be posted by any RMN member and may not reflect the views of the management staff of Rock M Nation or SB Nation.
13 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The highs are high.
The lows are low.
And when Celebration Dog doesn’t get to celebrate, even Asian Kid is sullen and quiet.
by Mac6uffin on Dec 30, 2010 11:24 AM CST reply actions 2 recs
This sums it up very well.
Dr. Ausgiano schools me in the classroom and on the field of battle
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Dec 31, 2010 12:56 PM CST up reply actions
I just want perspective
I don’t want people to be completely happy with everything Mizzou does all the time. That’s ludicrous. I just want perspective.
I want us as fans to be able to ENJOY the good times instead of bitching and moaning about everything.
Not that many teams can expect a Top 25 season, much less 10 wins on a regular basis.
I'm an Iowa fan...so I'll keep my head low
But generally speaking, I think any GOOD fan is a a fan that can look at their team and admit the warts. Iowa had TONS of warts this year, but a lot of shiny spots as well.
Same with Missouri. Any good fan rejoices in the best of times and wails/gnashes teeth in the worst of times. However, it’s all while keeping things in perspective. Missouri (and Iowa for that matter) will probably never be at the level of a Florida/USC/Ohio State. Just not in the cards. All I ask is that Iowa is competitive each year, with a (legit) shot at the Big 10 title every 2 years and go to a bowl game (almost) every year. If you’re competing for a Big 10 (or Big 12…or whatever they’re calling these conferences now) title, chances are, you’ll be in the running for the MNC game as well.
If you worship the ground your team walks on, never questioning it, I don’t think that’s fandom. That’s something else.
I’ve lived in Missouri for the better part of a decade now, more than half of that spent in Columbia on KFRU. I know Tiger Nation. It’s a fantastic fanbase. But, like any other, there are some deluded souls who chug from the kool-aid keg. There are those in Iowa City that do the same, make no mistake. Besides, and let’s really be honest hear, if you knew Missouri (or Iowa in my case) was going to win the title every single year…what fun would there be in following them?
Black and Gold Blood: Cubbie Blue Heart
Twitter: @MattLaCasse
To quote Conan...
no, the other Conan when asked what is best in life:
“To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.”
Fair point.
But since we’re not marauding barbarians, and talking about CFB, if that element of doubt is removed as to the outcome of the game and/or season, there’s no joy in watching/following the team.
Black and Gold Blood: Cubbie Blue Heart
Twitter: @MattLaCasse
by MissouriHawk on Dec 30, 2010 1:57 PM CST up reply actions
In all honesty
I would like to find out
The only measure of true success in the NFL is the Vince Lombardi trophy. Anything less is a rationalization.
Unfortunately for you, Bartender . . .
. . . is the setting in which you must deal with non-analytical fans – a bar. In the same sense that 90% of all crimes are committed while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, so are most ridiculous, highly imaginative, yet uninformed – though often quite comical – sports commentaries spewed forth.
This is what has been most impressive to me about RMN. Many contributors are at their best when they are doing the live commentaries; often missing keys and failing to use their best grammar due to imbibing their favorite brew while watching the game and banging away at their keyboards. They are intelligent enough, however, and educated enouth to remain reasonably analytical – and the brew has sharpened their sabres of wit and sarcasm to near-deadly effectiveness.
After 30 years of print journalism, and many hundreds (if not thousands) of challenges from parents, grandparents, neighbors, teachers, etc. regarding my coverage of high school and college athletics, I love the isolation of my remote Ozark farm where I am accountable only to my own soul, and I can quickly glide past the opinions of those tortured souls who find no joy in life and want to steal the joy of life from others by accentuating the negative, and failing to recognize the difference between critique and criticism.
You, however, must deal with such persons in person, and at their worst, and treat them as customers: my Tiger cap is off to you, Brother, I could not do so.
Go Mizzou!
Its not quite as bad as that sounds...
I am fluent in DrunkSpeak. I can translate on the fly, and most times when the conversation steers towards sports, I grasp the underlying CAUSE of their argument, and can direct my monosyllabic, slowly paced retort in that direction. It doesn’t help them not repeat themselves sixteen times, or actually listen to what I have to say, but it makes it clear that they are missing something and that I am fully in command of both my faculties and a (modestly) large breadth and depth of factual sports knowledge.
Its when the moderately sober ones just wander like a lost little lamb off the path and start heaving “conventional wisdom bombs” around. It still shocks me, some, I guess. Though some of my best retorts and comebacks have been used so many times that other regulars will monotone out what I’m about to say and everyone has a good laugh.
We all do what we do. Your makeup is different than mine. But I appreciate the hat’s off, just as I tip my hat to all the sports journalists out there, like yourself, Cal.
Sports is a great unite-er, but it can also lead to some epic disagreements.
Bet me!
by TigerBartender on Jan 1, 2011 8:37 AM CST up reply actions
I hope you and countrycal check for replies as I am late for this thread.
“Let schoolmasters puzzle their brains with grammar and nonsense and learning; Good liquor I stoutly maintain, gives genius a better discerning.”………..We have all been in a mind set at one time or another to question what just happened in a game we are involved in as a fan. I can’t stand the ones who constantly spew forth negativity all throughout the contest. I myself have been a critic of the decisions of coaches and players at times, but I do believe in the direction the HCGP is taking this program. 2011 is going to be great! If Gabbert stays, I think he can only get better. If he jumps, I think we have great replacements. MIZ…
"Every absurdity has a champion to defend it" Olivar Goldsmith
I rewatched the game last night
First, it’s amazing how many little details you pick up watching a game live instead of on tv. Gabbert would make some motion to his receivers and I would think, “Oh, I remember that, Pinkel’s about to call time out and set up the screen pass for the td”.
Second, Missouri owned Iowa in the second half. I had this impression watching from the stands, but watching on tv cemented that fact. Yes, the Iowa offense moved the ball pretty well but the D kept them out of the end zone and I don’t think Stanzi had any confidence left until probably the last drive. The Iowa defense was completely gassed in the third quarter and they should send Gabbert a thank you card for giving them one chance to redeem themselves. I’m not saying that to be insulting, it was just clear that they had no answer for Mizzou’s offense. Anyone complaining that Gabbert sucks clearly was not watching the game. Anyone complaining that Yost doesn’t know how to call a game clearly was not watching the game. It was one of those fluke COTG losses that typify Missouri, but that shouldn’t detract from what Mizzou accomplished. They took a very good Big Ten team down to the wire and they didn’t let a few offensive or defensive miscues break them. I’m almost hoping for an NFL lockout just so that Gabbert and Agent Smith and company will come back next year. With that veteran leadership and the 2010 recruiting class getting more playing time, I think next year could be very exciting.
"Smell the perfume but don't drink it because it might kill you." Erin Andrews recounting advise from Gary Pinkel

































