Mizzou Links, 2-1-10
by Bill C. on Feb 1, 2010 5:33 AM CST
in News
Email
PrintBeing that I didn't throw some links together yesterday, you get a monster set today...
Mizzou > OSU
- The Trib: Tigers bury Cowboys under 3-point barrage
The Trib: Suddenly, Missouri can't miss
The Trib: Moore's key board helps Tigers bounce back from blowout in Lawrence
The Trib: Slide Show - The Missourian: Oklahoma State catches Missouri at wrong time
The Missourian: Missouri freshman guard regains confidence - Post-Dispatch: MU's shots fall, and so do Cowboys
- PowerMizzou: Finding the Range
- Daily Oklahoman: Mistake-prone Cowboys fall at Missouri
Plus...from the Trib: Bruins' Kreklow comfortable playing at Mizzou Arena
Big 12 Links
- Kansas 81, Kansas State 79
ESPN.com: Collins battles back injury to help No. 2 Kansas survive No. 13 Kansas State in OT
Bring On the Cats: Postgame Reaction: KU
Rock Chalk Talk: Statistical Rearview: The Octagon is Doomed
KC Star (Upon Further Review): KU-KSU Basketball: The Rivalry Intensifies
KC Star (Whitlock): Jayhawks have all but clinched Big 12 title
KC Star (Campus Corner): Octagon of Doom? Hold the Hype
Topeka Capital-Journal: Cats can't get, or give, key foul - Baylor 80, Texas 77 (OT)
ESPN.com: Texas suffers 3rd loss in last 4 games after falling in OT to Baylor
Burnt Orange Nation: Baylor Recap and An Eye to the Future
Houston Chronicle: No. 24 Baylor beats No. 6 Texas in OT
Austin American Statesman (Bohls): Texas' shortcoming start with free-throw shooting
Dallas Morning News (Chuck Carlton): Time for Texas men to step up - Texas A&M 85, Texas Tech 70
ESPN.com: Texas A&M rips Texas Tech for 15th straight win at home - Nebraska 63, Oklahoma 46
ESPN.com: NU 63, OU 46
Corn Nation: Husker Recap: First Big 12 Win - Iowa State 64, Colorado 63
ESPN.com: ISU 64, CU 63
Clone Chronicles: Brackins Remembers How To Play Basketball, As ISU Edges Colorado
ESPN.com: Colorado G Alec Burks day to day with knee sprain - Burnt Orange Nation: Big XII Projected Standings by Tier
Weatherspoon Shines at Senior Bowl
- National Football Post: Graham, Gilyard, Weatherspoon shine in Senior Bowl
- Bolts from the Blue: Senior Moments: The Game Edition
- Boston Herald: Patriots doing some pregame grilling
- RealGM Football: Senior Bowl: Win, Lose or Draw
- Palm Beach Post (Blog): Nose tackle Dan Williams a bright spot for Tony Sparano's South squad
- Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Blog): Senior Bowl Review -- Risers and Fallers
Plus...from the Missourian: Justin Smith records sack in Pro Bowl!
Recruiting Links
- The Trib: Happy to wait for Richardson
The Trib: Tigers show they can come up bigJudging by his production, Richardson’s detour hasn’t been a dead end. Despite playing with what he diagnosed as a minor knee injury and a thigh contusion, Richardson earned first-team All-California Region II honors after leading his team with 65 tackles and 17 tackles for loss. He also posted three sacks, deflected two passes, recovered a fumble and blocked a kick.
...If Richardson’s path goes according to plan, he’ll arrive at Missouri with three years to complete three seasons of eligibility. And if that happens, Missouri’s defensive line will add one of the best prospects Danny Heitert has ever seen.
...“Let me put it this way, he ran things down from behind as well as Justin Smith, and he was better at the point of attack,” Heitert said. “He was better than Grant Wistrom, and that’s saying something.
“He was the best three-point stance player ever. Ever.”
- PowerMizzou: 2011 stars talk junior day
- Daily Oklahoman (Barry Tramel): Behind recruiting curtain
SimmonsField.com's Pre-Season FAQ links
Plus, a Trib baseball link to boot: What do we have here?
Other Mizzou Links
- Mizzou Women's Basketball
MUtigers.com: Kansas Secures 61-59 Win Over Mizzou
The Trib: Missouri women can't catch a break
The Missourian: Women's basketball makes late charge but falls short - Mizzou Gymnastics
The Missourian: Shire, Burke bolster Missouri gymnastics team
Other
- NY Times: Colleges Prepare for Ripple Effects as Big Ten Studies Expansion
(And no, there was nothing realistic whatsoever to the "Pitt to Big Ten?" rumors yesterday. It's still going to be a while)
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes, A +++
Good Story and the comments were pretty good too.
by B_W on Feb 1, 2010 9:39 AM CST up reply actions
Not a bad idea...
…though I may need a gentle reminder Wednesday morning. :-)
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
Don't know about by a mile.
For some reason?? I cannot get enough Sheldon Richardson info :)
by B_W on Feb 1, 2010 9:41 AM CST up reply actions
Take your medicine Coach Ford
Will Ebners Hit Parade, Pain TV; Channel 32; All the time! (PDT)
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Feb 1, 2010 12:57 PM CST up reply actions
I loved the Burnt Orange Nation Link
I would love it if we were able to finish 2nd in the conference and staying undefeated at home. But we all know the conference schedule can never be predicted by a system.
By the way...
There was nothing realistic whatsoever to the “Pitt to Big Ten?” rumors yesterday
BUT BLEACHER REPORT SAID THERE WAS!!!!!!!!!1
Crazy, right?
I enjoy that people are revealing the absurdities of how rumors spread on the internet (examples: Pitt to Big Ten! and “OMG BIELEMA TO NOTRE DAME!!!”), but if nobody’s going to actually learn their lesson and learn not to spread completely unsourced rumors, then it just becomes really annoying. As somebody put it, they’ve expanded twice in about a century…pretty sure they’re going to take longer than three weeks to make a decision. But people ran with it anyway…
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
I heard a counter-rumor to that
Pitt sent that around to increase recruiting, and the Big Ten was actually going with Mizzou.
Making you feel old since 9/26/09
What I don't understand about the Pitt stuff:
I just don’t understand what the Big 10 would want with Pitt. Pitt would easily jump and the Big 10 wouldn’t have to worry about much of a resistance to getting them from the Big East. And Pitt would be a solid addition to basketball and football. However, Pitt adds nothing to the league at all. Penn State already owns the same TV markets and Pitt doesn’t help to add Philly to the footprint of the Big 10. I also don’t see the school adding any money to the Big 10 outside of having a championship game (which any team would allow)
So why add Pitt to the Big 10 unless they simply want a rival for Penn State.
Funny you should mention that
I logged on to say exactly what thoran85 did. As usual, I’m too late and not talented enough. So I’ll just shut up and look pretty.
"Wherever you go, there you are" - Buckaroo Bonzai
You do a damn fine job of it.
I think Pitt would be an acceptable choice if the goal is simply a solid 12th team and a championship game. If they wanted to add markets, however, it would obviously make less than zero sense. That’s really their only major black mark, though. In terms of academics and athletics, they’re certainly an acceptable pick.
(Of course, that’s a really big black mark…)
Rock M Nation
Thrust nunchuk upward!
I like Pitt for that role because Pitt isn't us.
but I also really don’t want Mizzou to go to the Big10
Great Oden's Raven I love Mike "The Predator" Dixon!
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
