Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Projects: Andre Holmes

Derrick Washington, a captain and starting tailback on the Missouri football team, was issued an order of protection by Boone County Circuit Court Judge Leslie Schneider in June after allegations of sexual assault, according to court documents obtained by the Missourian on Thursday.

Via The Missourian. Forget football, folks. This is some serious business.

over 1 year ago Sb_-_helmet_tiny RPT 69 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Rock M Nation

Mizzou Links, 4-27-11

Apr 2011 by Bill C. - 12 comments

2011 Walkthrough: Running Backs

Jan 2011 by Bill C. - 31 comments

Kansas: Beyond the Box Score

Dec 2010 by Bill C. - 42 comments

Comments

Display:

not good

I never would have saw this coming

by MizzouSteve on Aug 26, 2010 10:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Man, this is horrible news.

I really feel for the victim. I really didn’t see this coming from Derrick.

He hit it good. He hit it good.

by Jack618 on Aug 26, 2010 10:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Innocent until proven guilty...

But football is the least of Washington’s concerns at this point.

by Husker Mike on Aug 26, 2010 10:16 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yes, he is.

I hope it’s not true, but you don’t want to see him even put himself in a situation where this kind of stuff can happen.

He hit it good. He hit it good.

by Jack618 on Aug 26, 2010 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I certainly hope the facts eventually clear Derrick Washington

but this is the kind of thing we simply can’t have around our football program. Kudos to Gary Pinkel for once again doing what is necessary instead of what is easy.

by ZouDave on Aug 26, 2010 10:16 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm going to Rec this comment...

And beg and plead that all commenters adhere to this philosophy.

by RPT on Aug 26, 2010 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ditto.

Either he did something unfathomable, or he’s being wrongly accused. Either way, this is awful, and I hope justice is correctly served.

by Bill C. on Aug 26, 2010 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Quick question:

Was no police report filed? I saw no reference of a police report in the story, merely court documents, and I imagine there’s absolutely no way a police report with his name would have slipped past reporters.

by RPT on Aug 26, 2010 10:29 PM CDT reply actions  

xx
Prosecuting attorney Andrea Hayes said only that she had been referred a case on Derrick Washington.

That referral usually comes from the police in the form of a report.

In most cases, the police are the ones who would have referred her to the Order of Protection process.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Orders of Protection

are not available via casenet and not open to the public.

One of the parties or a court clerk leaked the papers.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is the most interesting thing I've heard yet.

Do both sides have incentive to leak? Would the plantiff’s party have incentive to push this into the public consciousness since he’d avoided any public scorn by not showing up in a police report? Would Washington’s representation put it out there to help poke holes in the argument?

by RPT on Aug 26, 2010 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Both are good guesses

We just have to wait and see what the Prosecutor does.

But remember NOT ONE THING has been proven by anyone.

These are ALL allegations with nothing substantiated by evidence other than an affidavit of the alleged victim.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 11:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great, so...

The Missourian runs this, but got the documents “illegally?” And now we all know, whether it be truth or fiction, that he’s a possible criminal, and someone is afraid of him, but yet we don’t?

I felt better about all this hours ago.

Finds MvP RoC to be a stellar individual

by Ausgiano on Aug 26, 2010 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Orders of Protection are not

available to the public.

Someone leaked this.

I will be curious to see what the Prosecutor has to say. She has only said she has been referred a case – not whether she is going to file charges or decline.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

so we have a hanging judge?

Maybe Crane will crack some skulls, get this all figured out by lunchtime.

Finds MvP RoC to be a stellar individual

by Ausgiano on Aug 26, 2010 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

An Ex Parte Order of Protection

is given on the testimony of the alleged victim. Basically one fills out the paperwork and the ex parte is issued right then and there.

The Respondent is then served with the papers and ordered to participate in the full hearing. Both of the parties didn’t show up so the case was dismissed by the Judge. It was dismissed without prejudice meaning the alleged victim can refile it.

I hope justice is served. Orders of Protection are a strange bird.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

a TOP, or temporary order of protection,

is as tigers and chiefs fan described. it’s just for the time between the request and the hearing, and it’s limited in scope. a full order of protection is permanent, or at least of a more extended period of time, and can be broader in terms of what it proscribes.

by nycbirdo on Aug 26, 2010 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

No charges or arrest could have been why

also, if police wereinvestigating the allegations they usually don’t like to comment publicly on that stuff when there isn’t an actual case at the time.

There may not have been a police report made yet on this situation.

by M Krip on Aug 26, 2010 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes but if the victim were to

file a police report now, how does that look filling it two months after said event.

Great moments are born from great opportunity.
Follow me on Twitter @muwxman

by muwxman on Aug 26, 2010 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm confused by the article
A court hearing was scheduled for July 7, but the woman asked for a continuance the day before the hearing. The hearing would have determined whether a full order of protection was to be issued. The order of protection was renewed until the new court date of July 21.

Neither party showed up to the hearing, and the case was dismissed without prejudice. This means that the issue can come before the courts again, according to the Missouri Bar.

Ok, the original court date was 7/7, so the team/AD had to have known about this for 6 weeks now, if not 2+ months since the original incident. How is this just coming out now? Did Pinkel want to do it closer to the season to see if there’d be a resolution at the 7/21 court date (which, again, was a month ago). The case is dismissed at this point, so do they know of something that is going to open up again?

Seems very strange to me. But, if he is guilty, I hope the victim is able to get justice. If this is a case of mistaken identities or an otherwise false accusation, I hope his name is cleared quickly.

by Andy--01 on Aug 26, 2010 10:30 PM CDT reply actions  

I just had that same conversation with a friend

<blockquote? Did Pinkel want to do it closer to the season to see if there’d be a resolution at the 7/21 court date (which, again, was a month ago).>

My guess is they were waiting for a resolution, one hasn’t come, and Pinkel can’t wait any longer with this out there.

But…it still doesn’t make much sense with the timing. What has changed?

by ZouDave on Aug 26, 2010 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe

The team is moving from camp mentality to game week preparation mentality….and Pinkel wants a definite go or no-go on Washington before he includes him in his plans. Maybe the idea was to let Washington practice until they began to prepare for Illinois, so if this thing can get resolved soon, he’ll at least have been to camp with everyone and can be dropped into the gameplan (pending further suspension beyond 1 game).

by CPC on Aug 27, 2010 1:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have a few questions

but these are journalistic questions concerning the why the article is written.

1. The reader (me) is left to assume that there is no current order of protection. True?
2. Was Derrick formally arrested? Or because of the dismissal, nothing of the June occurrence was kept open?
3. Why now? Because it was passed on the prosecutor? Will he be arrested in the morning?

Finds MvP RoC to be a stellar individual

by Ausgiano on Aug 26, 2010 10:30 PM CDT reply actions  

xx

1. Yes.
2. Not arrested. Order of Protection is a civil remedy.
3. Prosecutor can file charges or nolle pros. My bet is on the latter. Lots of time with no charges filed means it is probably a crappy case.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice to have an attorney on the comment board.

Everyone keep tigers and chiefs fan in mind when you next break the law! :)

"Don’t want to spend my night waiting in line unless it’s for more beer."
--EssBee, on LoneStarBall, Jan. 21, 2010

by ghtd36 on Aug 26, 2010 10:39 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

You're putting in good work tonight.

Thanks for answering questions.

He hit it good. He hit it good.

by Jack618 on Aug 26, 2010 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

My pleasure

I was a Domestic Violence Prosecutor so I know all about the seedy underbelly of Order of Protection hearings. Really depressing shit and an over-utilized legal remedy which dilutes the importance of people who really need protection from their abusers.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well said . . .

. . . due to false claims – often for the purpose of giving one better positioning in divorce settlements – the ones who truly need help have their protection orders ignored or overlooked until things really get out of hand and someone gets hurt.

by countrycal on Aug 27, 2010 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I am surprised

that we are just now hearing about this for the first time and that Coach Pinkel is taking action right now as opposed to doing it much sooner when the allegation was made or at least waiting until something more substantial like charges. I just don’t understand the signifcance of “today” in relation to all of this.

by M Krip on Aug 26, 2010 10:31 PM CDT reply actions  

aldon: "i have known for weeks"

for pinkel’s reputations sake, i hope he just found out today. because, for all of the (deserved) credit that weve been giving him, he would have some explaining to do if he too had “known for weeks”

CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS-2010 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!

by elpjuly4 on Aug 26, 2010 10:33 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't think that's true.

It sounds like they were evaluating the situation before they released any information, and since you’re dealing with an incredibly sensitive situation, not just relative to Washington but also to the victim. You don’t want to give legs to something like that if you don’t have to.

Making fun of the "Mizzou Needs a Fullback" Club since...well, for a while, anyway.

by jaeger on Aug 26, 2010 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Agreed.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 10:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok...so maybe the timeline is this

The incident is alleged, Pinkel and Alden know about it, get DW’s side of the story, decide to wait and see the legal outcome.

The legal outcome is the case is dismissed, everything seems to have gone away.

The Order of Protection info is leaked (according to the information above, that’s how we’d know about it) to the Columbia Missourian. The Missourian contacts Pinkel/Alden/AD Office for comment, they realize they can’t be silent anymore, so in light of the fact that a story is coming decide to suspend Washington indefinitely until there’s an official outcome.

Maybe?

by ZouDave on Aug 26, 2010 10:58 PM CDT reply actions  

so, they suspend someone for nothing?

He’s not charged with anything, or restrained from contact. They don’t need to tell us if they did something to him in the summer.

The story was posted at 9:59 PM, two minutes before the evening news, or SportsCenter, could run with it. There’s something about this, that right now, seems dirty. I don’t know why I feel that way, but I do.

Finds MvP RoC to be a stellar individual

by Ausgiano on Aug 26, 2010 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

It doesn't make sense

We don’t have the full story to say the least. Right now, the bits of info along with the action by Coach Pinkel without any charges at this point just doesn’t make sense. He could have suspended him for this a month ago or waited until things progressed further.

by M Krip on Aug 26, 2010 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

heh

I wish we were coordinated enough to post the story with the intent of scooping SportsCenter. The first week of classes, I doubt that’s the case.

by jschooltiger on Aug 27, 2010 7:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Both criminal justice and politics . . .

. . . are run by attorneys, who are rightly taught to get as much legal leverage as possible for their client or cause, whichever the case may be. Thus the two often intertwine. When one attorney’s ethics do not match those of the common public, the case raises a stink – like the one we are smelling now. The manipulation of the system may not be illegal, but it still has the feeling of being wrong. In this case, as in many, the university has to consider the possibility of an attorney for the alleged victim waiting until the season starts before resuming the charges, thus making the case much more important than it might otherwise have been.

by countrycal on Aug 27, 2010 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Clarification
When one attorney’s ethics do not match those of the common public, the case raises a stink – like the one we are smelling now.

To be fair, don’t you think it’s more accurate to say that we know about this case because Mizzou’s starting tailback is involved, not because of any perceived ethical shortcomings of an attorney? Do you even know the name of a lawyer involved (if any), besides the prosecutor?

by Ray Lankford on Aug 27, 2010 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

You are correct . . .

. . . my comment wrongfully assumes the alleged victim is represented by an attorney, or that said possible attorney or the alleged victim is the one who leaked the story.

We know about this story because the protection order was unethically leaked; the story took on an exaggerated life because a Mizzou starting tailback is involved.

From past experience, it has often – but not always – been the accusing side, through an attorney’s filing of pre-trial motions or interviews with press personnel, that has implicated well-known individuals despite the fact the court records were sealed. I made the mistake of assuming based on such experience: thanks for serving as my editor.

by countrycal on Aug 27, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think that scenario is close

But with a few changes.

Incident happens
Pinkel & Co. learn of it, gather info
Pinkel & Co. wait to see what happens, suspending a player in the summer that isn’t arrested, charged, or convicted of anything is a bit silly
Now that we’re ready to start actual season preparation, and it’s obvious a resolution won’t be achieved, Pinkel & Co. finally suspend Washington

I guess the question is if Washington is not fit to practice now, why was he fit to practice throughout all of camp? What will he be doing in the meantime to stay in shape?

by shaffe on Aug 26, 2010 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

maybe so he is ready for the season?

if pinkel and co thought/knew that washington was innocent and nothing would come of the case maybe they decided to let him get ready for the season before making anything of it.

now that he seems to be in opening day condition he suspends him and waits for a resolution to the situation?

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Aug 26, 2010 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Remember there are two case possible.

The civil case is the Order of Protection. And that case was dismissed by the Judge since there was no evidence (i.e. testimony of the alleged victim).

The criminal case would be filed by the Prosecutor. I guess the only quote she gave was that she had been referred a case. She eventually will have to say whether she will file or not.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

The length of time this has taken to still not really amount to anything seems encouraging

It seems to me that if there was anything decently substantial that the courts would (rightfully) be all over a sexual assault case. That the defendant didn’t even bother to show up to court says something to me. I’m not saying she’s lying or that Washington definitely didn’t do anything – but it seems like a 50/50 shot that nothing ever comes of this.

Am I totally off base, here?

by shaffe on Aug 26, 2010 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's the way it appears at first blush

But we don’t have all the facts.

They are only allegations at this point.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

not off base but

I would say that something already has come of this. Washington is suspened. The initial allegation has been made public and between the two we have now have a topic that many reporters will jump on to hound Coach Pinkel throughout the season over. and its obviously one that will irritate him to no end. Not only that, but with the suspension every pregame commentary is going to zero in on the allegations and the fact that Washington is either suspended from playing, or now allowed to play despite the alleged incident.

My concerns as far as the team and Coach Pinkel are concerned is that this could very well be a serious distraction possibly for the entire season.

As a fan, I am horribly deflated right now.

by M Krip on Aug 26, 2010 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're right something has come of this

From the on the field standpoint the damage has certainly been done. I was thinking with regards to Washington’s future off the field, though.

by shaffe on Aug 26, 2010 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wondered about this too, but I don't know if it indicates one way or another
That the defendant didn’t even bother to show up to court says something to me.

No idea how common this is, but it seemed peculiar to me, especially since BOTH parties didn’t show. Focusing on her, I can see this going both ways…maybe she didn’t show because she didn’t feel/was convinced by her attorney that she didn’t have a case. Or maybe she didn’t show because she was truly afraid of Washington, or possible repercussions. It’s not uncommon for sexual assault and rape victims to avoid pursuing justice due to fear.

Follow me on twitter.com/SteveCusumano

by MizzouCus on Aug 26, 2010 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

how common is it for both parties to just not show up for a court date?

that seems odd to me, to just not show up with no (public) reason given.

Follow me on twitter.com/SteveCusumano

by MizzouCus on Aug 27, 2010 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not unusual in an order of protection case

The first one is given solely on the testimony of the alleged victim, and it is temporary. In order to extend it, there has to be a hearing. It’s pretty common for the parties to simply let the first one lapse and not get a permanent order. And there really isn’t much incentive for the defendant to show. All the order does is require him to stay away from the alleged victim. Unless it’s a family situation, it’s in his interest to stay away regardless of whether there’s an order in place.

by Michael Atchison on Aug 27, 2010 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not entirely sure of the timeline

as many of you know, I work at the Missourian but not in the newspaper’s newsroom (I have some connection to the magazine faculty and often teach a magazine staff editing class, but it’s a semi-separate publication). The overnight note I got last night said that the Missourian got “a tip” about this at 4:30 and reporters went down to the courthouse to check it out. I’m as puzzled as the rest of you (I was in the bowels of our server room until like 6 last night and out of the loop).

We do have an 11 a.m. planning meeting that’s open to the public. I’m certainly going to be there to see what I can glean. Third floor, Lee Hills Hall, Eighth and Elm.

by jschooltiger on Aug 27, 2010 7:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

wish I could make that 11am meeting

please share details from that when you can – I doubt there will be any revelation, but it will be interesting to see how the leaked Order of Protection is handled, and if the Missourian brass addresses why they felt the tip was credible.

Follow me on twitter.com/SteveCusumano

by MizzouCus on Aug 27, 2010 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

One more thing before I go to bed.

Cases of sexual assault take a lot of time to develop because there is lots of scientific evidence that needs to be gathered, tested, etc.. . . There could have been a rape kit, testing of blood for drugs, etc. . . and all of that takes time to develop.

We just have to wait and see if the Prosecutor files the case or not.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 11:21 PM CDT reply actions  

The Missourian has updated their story

with actual text from her Petition for Order of Protection.

Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost.
Martina Navratilova

by tigers and chiefs fan on Aug 26, 2010 11:32 PM CDT reply actions  

You could always file...

a Public Information Request for a redacted copy of the case report.

"When among evil companions, try to fit in." - Wild Bill Donovan

by Kpz1234 on Aug 27, 2010 2:47 AM CDT reply actions  

not sure i agree

With the suspension just yet. I mean what if this girl is lying? He has been charged with nothing. All it takes is some one accusing you of something to get removed from team till its hammered out? Not saying he is innocent or guilty but isn’t that what courts are for. If he is innocent I think pinkel and the MU AD let their players down. Also the accuser not showing to the civil case in court says something.

by The Oracle on Aug 27, 2010 10:03 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I think the suspension is a move to protect the university, the athletic department and the football team

Alden (and I assume Pinkel) have known about this for some time now, but since no charges were filed and no one was arrested, they didn’t have a reason to do anything about. Now that the season is only a week out, the team’s focus shifts from preparing for the season to preparing for Illinois, and it’s Pinkel’s responsibility to prepare his team for success without Washington.

I’m guessing that Alden and Pinkel believe the prosecutor will decide soon whether or not to pursue with charges, but Pinkel didn’t want to create a situation where charges came down a day before the Illinois game and be forced to react at the last second. Better to get ahead of the story and suspend Washington from the team now – it will be easier to bring Washington back into the gameplan then to adjust for his sudden removal.

Follow me on twitter.com/SteveCusumano

by MizzouCus on Aug 27, 2010 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

As Atch said, the accuser not showing is not uncommon.

I wouldn’t read much into that. We can take the set of facts we’ve been given and go down the road toward two completely opposite conclusions: 1) that D-Wash did something really, really bad, and the reason it hadn’t come to light yet is that the victim feels she needs extra protection from him, and 2) that the victim doesn’t have a case and only leaked this now to hurt D-Wash right before his final season began. In other words, we don’t have enough information to draw any concrete conclusions.

Assuming Pinkel knew what was going on back in July (and since Alden said he knew, I assume Pinkel knew too), I almost wonder if the suspension is due as much to getting Washington out of the glare as anything else. I can’t imagine anything new came to light yesterday from their standpoint (though I obviously don’t know that for sure), so maybe they felt it best (for him and for the team) if he wasn’t a distraction right now. Complete guess on my part.

by Bill C. on Aug 27, 2010 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Matter has more on the story

http://ht.ly/2vMGX

It goes into a bit more detail, that while obviously really serious stuff, does seem to rule out some of the worst case scenarios that come to mind when you hear the phrase “sexual assault”.

By the way, what’s the preferred method of giving updates on developing stories? In this format I’m never quite sure if it should be in the same comments section, a new fanpost, new fanshot, etc. Same situation with developing Expansionpalooza stuff.

"I'm a genius, but I'm a misunderstood genius."
"What's misunderstood about you?"
"Nobody thinks I'm a genius."

by Transmogrified Tiger on Aug 27, 2010 10:42 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Rock M Nation: a.k.a. Burnt End Nation.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Charlie Weis is pregnant
Small
You guys have the cuttiest fan post
Small
OT: HIV/AIDS & Dining Out for Life
Tiger_small
UH & Rice forgo pettiness to continue football rivalry post split
Mizzou__1_small
Beergut Gone?
Mizzoukids_small
Sponsor my Hospital Hill Half-Marathon (Help kids!)
Small
MIZZOU Nation I need your support
Tumblr_lpfflf9tp51qzxe21o1_500_small
4-14-12: Brand New Stripes
Madjay_small
OT: TB gets WAAAAY off-topic, and begs...
Small
New Football Commit

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

RMN on Twitter


Managers

Babyfoot_small Bill C.

Calvin_20and_20hobbes_small The Beef

Editors

Untitled_small ghtd36

Sleepy_small SleepyFloyd7

Zdrock_small ZouDave

Authors

Small dcrockett17

1929059-rush-clockwork-angels-617_small D-Sing

Small BillCarter

Madjay_small TigerBartender