Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sixers Vs. Celtics: Countdown To Game Seven

Is it Time for the BIG 12 Nuclear Option?


The Big12 has now lost Nebraska, Colorado, and Texas A&M.  Missouri, reportedly, has one foot out the door.  This will bring the Big12 down to 9 Teams and a television footprint of only four states.  Is it time for them to pull out the nukes to ensure their survival and stability?

Star-divide

 

While Dan Beebe may not have been the most astute conference chairman,  someone in his office wasn't exactly stupid either.  Guess who owns the trademark and logo for THE BIG14?  That's right, the Big12 does.  No one disputes the validity of the conference's continued existence as long as Texas and Oklahoma are on board, but can you really claim to be a MAJOR conference when only one game per year draws national viewership?  Can there really be a sense of fairness and stability when everyone knows that if one of those two teams exit the conference the money will dry up as quick as the current contract expires? 

So how do you fix it?  You do what any nation threatened with invasion does.  Invade first.  The Big12 needs space, as in an increased television footprint: it needs more than one national draw, as in something other than the Red River Rivalry; it needs increased competition at the top, everyone loves the heavy weight title fight but the undercards are an important preamble; and it needs border security, to prevent the constant loss of teams searching for stability.  To achieve all of these goals you do what any nation threatened would do.  You invade your weaker neighbors and take the best they have to offer.  You forget about going back to 12 teams and jump straight to 14 becoming the BIG14.

First, you already own the rights to the name so enact it.  Leave all the negative publicity of the BIG12 behind and become the BIG 14 and make the news for all the right reasons because you had so many teams that wanted to join you just couldn't stop at 12.  A five team addition and the restoration of your Conference Championship game puts the BIG14 back on the national map and with the right set of teams, gives the BIG14 an increased television footprint.

Second and Third, you build the conference not just in footprint, but also in strength of schedule.  Oklahoma, Texas, OK State and Kansas State are all ranked teams.  So add at the top and middle.  The SEC has 6 perennially ranked teams, that should be the goal, at least 6 teams always in the Top 25.  It never hurts if one of the teams who join also happens to have created a niche market for itself due to its occasional upset of your conference champion in a BCS bowl game.  Most of the nation would watch that rematch, period.

Fourth, by going straight to 14, you ensure that should you lose a team or two in the future your existence is never in question.

With all that said, the question becomes who should be invited to join?  See if these additions make sense.

1.- Boise State.  They need you for your automatic bid.  You need them to increase the strength of your conference schedule and give viewers a national draw.  I don't care if I live to be 100 I will always remember the Fiesta Bowl and will always watch to see if Oklahoma redeems themselves in a rematch or do the Broncos Statue of Liberty their way to another undefeated season.

2- West Virginia.  The Big East is dying a slow and painful death.  Put them, and the rest of the country, out of it's misery and take the only football property worth watching away.  West Virginia has an excellent athletic program and consistently ranks in the top 25.

3-BYU.  National draw, good media market and good athletic program.

4-Louisville.  Good media market, excellent Basketball program, and a profitable athletic department.

5- USF.  Yes, USF.  South Florida gives you Tampa for television and a presence in Florida.  Texas and Florida are always good for a few television dollars.

The Big East may or may not survive but that really isn't the Big14's problem now is it?  These five schools added to TCU, Texas, Oklahoma, and OK State create one hell of a conference and push the footprint  to 9 states for television.  Every school adds value to the conference and should increase the contract size. 

Alright Big12 fans let me hear it.

FanPosts may be posted by any RMN member and may not reflect the views of the management staff of Rock M Nation or SB Nation.

Comment 19 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Rock M Nation

Big 12 Roundtable: Spring Football

Apr 2008 by RPT - 5 comments

My All-Big 12 Ballot

Nov 2007 by RPT - 3 comments

Comments

Display:

I like it a lot

Read somewhere recently that BYU is not out of the question (there were issues about sports on Sundays). It would certainly be a good thing if Boise and BYU were brought in even as football only.

Adding WVu and Louisville is cool with me and I am actually down with Mizzou leaving to allow these other more exciting football teams to join.

I have been pretty high on the USF Bulls too, because I want to see the Big 14 go after $EC territory and landing Florida recruits would be cool.

We're Texas, We're not OK.

by Wrangler86 on Oct 18, 2011 3:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Holgerson > Pinkel

Mucho mucho mas exciting, both on and off the field.

Louisville beat Kentucy at Lexington and lost their other games by 1 score. They are just fine and I have always liked watching them play.

We're Texas, We're not OK.

by Wrangler86 on Oct 19, 2011 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Super.

"...I'm not trying to act giddy but the guy is a stud.'' - Terry McDonough, Director of Player Personnel, Jacksonville Jaguars

by TmannZOU on Oct 21, 2011 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seriously?

More exciting football teams to join? Lousville has a laughable program and WVU is a solid program but a far cry from the whole package that Mizzou is.

Being high on USF just screams hodge-podge. If Mizzou leaves everyone knows that the Big 12 will just scrape together some teams so OU and UT can play each other every year. Having USF will not break into the SEC market. It will be third tier recruits after FSU and Florida get who they want. Just because you have a school in that state doesn’t mean recruits rush there. Especially when no one cares about the games within the conference. Louisville versus KSU, KU versus BYU, USF vs. Texas Tech? Who cares? The Big 12 hodge podge will struggle to create new rivalries. Regardless of who the Big 12 gets to join it will be a far cry from what it was. The Big 14 will not last. They are being outgrown and dominated by the B1G, Pac, SEC, and ACC. It won’t be long before Texas is done and OU wants nothing to do with them.

by GoalLineStand on Oct 18, 2011 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hope not...

As one who’s been pushing for the SEC from the beginning, and never wanted the B10, I’d still be sad to see the B12 implode after we left. KSU is a respectable program again, ISU occasionally bites someone, the south teams are all decent as of now, and it wasn’t nearly as long ago as it seems that even KU was relevant in a real sport.

Of course Wrangler’s talking nonsense about the prospective replacements being more exciting than us, but maybe in a few years the new additions will be competitive in the B12. Similarly, in a few years we should be competitive in the SEC. Heck, in a few years maybe even Texas will be competitive in the B12 again.

I think we’ve had some good times in what was the most underrated conference, and I’ll still keep an eye on things, hoping they can manage to pull it together.

Not that I’m willing to sacrifice Mizzou’s chance at greatness to keep it together, obviously.

by galactahack on Oct 18, 2011 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

ahem, basketball

is a real sport. even though ku is good at it.

"I font think you read MU post." - ravings of a 5HE deprived man

by threadkiller on Oct 19, 2011 8:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

What is this "chance at greatness" to which you allude?

How would you be sacrificing any chances if you stay? Dot you realy think you have a better chance to shine in the $EC, especially when you lose a lot of recruiting pipelines?

I prefer Mizzou stay for academics, not necessarily the athletics. The combination of Mizzou definitely makes them preferable over WVu or Louisville, but the variance is not conference imploding. It will just be a bummer and take a little getting used to. I’ll definitely be a Mizzou fan if they play in the SEC.

We're Texas, We're not OK.

by Wrangler86 on Oct 19, 2011 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Texas ISN'T the only state that plays football.

Hard to believe as it may be. I do think I heard that some other southeastern states had picked it up too or something.

"...I'm not trying to act giddy but the guy is a stud.'' - Terry McDonough, Director of Player Personnel, Jacksonville Jaguars

by TmannZOU on Oct 21, 2011 12:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Your assumption...

Is that we’ll lose pipelines by moving. Without a time machine, it’s all speculation, but apparently the Mizzou targets polled preferred the SEC.

by galactahack on Oct 21, 2011 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

If the Big 12 were really smart...

they’d go after these teams afte Mizzou leaves…

New Mexico, Colorado State, BYU on the western front and Louisville and Cincy on the Eastern side. That way the footprint of the league expands but is not that far reaching for travel concerns.

There is a God and I'm not it, after that EVERYTHING is subjective. Be careful for what you wish for, you just might GET IT!

by mizzoufan1 on Oct 18, 2011 7:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Cincy is almost as far as WVU, and not as tempting

I have mixed feelings on the Mountain West teams.

On the one hand, they have abysmal athletic departments and revenue generation.

On the other hand, they are in the fastest growing parts of the country. Who is to say that in 20 years they can’t be huge media draws?

I think the Big 12 does need to get some big names right now, for image purposes, but I think we also need to grab teams with an eye for the future. So, I wouldn’t be opposed to grabbing something like WVU and Louisville and then grab one or three teams from the Mountain West. If we grabbed Boise State that would fulfill both instant cache and future growth, but for some reason everybody really hates on Boise getting an invite. BYU is another good get, but we don’t really want to add another Texas, do we? From what I’ve read of the negotiations BYU was making a lot of demands in regards to special media broadcast rights.

Would you like some Freys with that?

by ChrisP Wildcat on Oct 24, 2011 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

*cache should be cachet

I always do that…

Would you like some Freys with that?

by ChrisP Wildcat on Oct 24, 2011 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Rock M Nation: a.k.a. Burnt End Nation.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Charlie Weis is pregnant
Small
You guys have the cuttiest fan post
Small
OT: HIV/AIDS & Dining Out for Life
Tiger_small
UH & Rice forgo pettiness to continue football rivalry post split
Mizzou__1_small
Beergut Gone?
Mizzoukids_small
Sponsor my Hospital Hill Half-Marathon (Help kids!)
Small
MIZZOU Nation I need your support
Tumblr_lpfflf9tp51qzxe21o1_500_small
4-14-12: Brand New Stripes
Madjay_small
OT: TB gets WAAAAY off-topic, and begs...
Small
New Football Commit

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

RMN on Twitter


Managers

Babyfoot_small Bill C.

Calvin_20and_20hobbes_small The Beef

Editors

Untitled_small ghtd36

Sleepy_small SleepyFloyd7

Zdrock_small ZouDave

Authors

Small dcrockett17

1929059-rush-clockwork-angels-617_small D-Sing

Small BillCarter

Madjay_small TigerBartender