The Rafters, Class of 2011: Clarence Gilbert

Clarence Gilbert (1998-02)

1998-99: 4.2 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 1.1 APG
1999-00: 13.7 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 2.3 APG
2000-01: 16.5 PPG, 2.7 RPG, 3.5 APG
2001-02: 17.0 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 3.2 APG
In Mizzou’s recent history, no player has had a greater flair for the dramatic than Clarence Gilbert, a 6’2" guard from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, famed for his pit bull intensity and freewheeling shot selection. What’s your favorite Gilbert moment? The night in his sophomore year when he made five of seven three-point shots and scored 24 points to lead Mizzou to an upset of Illinois? Or a month later when he went seven of ten from beyond the arc on his way to 27 points in an 81-59 rout of seventh-ranked Kansas? How about the afternoon he took a head-spinning 36 shots in a four-overtime victory over Iowa State? Or the night he drilled a 17-footer at the buzzer to beat Georgia in the NCAA Tournament? There was the 2001 Guardians Classic tournament where Gilbert won MVP honors after leading Mizzou from eleven points down with 2:15 to play to beat Iowa in the championship game. And there was the day in Colorado when he sank twelve three-pointers against the Buffs. Add it all together and you get a sensational career that saw Gilbert contribute to four NCAA Tournament teams and score 1,685 points, eighth most in Missouri history.
Michael Atchison: It’s hard to remember the days when Clarence Gilbert was regarded as a defense-first ball hawk. But that was his role as a freshman under Norm Stewart. He recorded nearly as many steals (43) as made shots (45). Things would change.
In his career, Clarence Gilbert attempted more shots than Steve Stipanovich, Anthony Peeler or Melvin Booker. Indeed, he attempted more shots than any Tiger other than Derrick Chievous and Doug Smith. And though the numbers say that Clarence wasn’t a great shooter – he made 37.6% of his attempts – he had a way of making every shot seem memorable. Jeff Boschee remembers the night he crawled inside of Clarence’s uniform only to see him drop bombs on Kansas anyway. Georgia remembers the seventeen-footer that knocked them out of the 2001 NCAA Tournament. Even the misses seem memorable. There was his crushing final game, in the Elite Eight against Oklahoma, when Gilbert made just one of sixteen from the field. There was the day he missed twenty-four shots against Iowa State and still scored 43 points. “You can’t stop (shooting),” Clarence said. “I don’t care if you miss ten. You might make eleven, you might make twelve.”
You must take the shot because you might make the shot. Those are the words that sum up the man.
Still, despite his I-don’t-wanna-be-tamed-style, Gilbert evolved into just the kind of leader the Tigers needed. As a senior, when it became clear that the team had no other defensive option at the point, Clarence slid over from his natural spot on the wing and steadied a ship on the verge of sinking. He didn’t exactly sacrifice his offense (there was the day when he made twelve three-pointers against Colorado), but he didn’t just shoot for the sake of shooting anymore. And he helped the Tigers match their best-ever NCAA Tournament performance with wins over Miami, Ohio State and UCLA.
People like to say that Clarence could shoot you into a game or shoot you out of it. But because of all the ones that fell, Clarence has shot himself into the Rafters.

19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
YES
Love Clarence Gilbert.
Twitter: KeysMyaths
Either I'm the only one that voted...
or I just am part of the hive-mind now.
But so far, the new inductees to The Rafters are the guys that I put first in all of my votes. Go me?
I'm going to imagine the former
Because I love the idea of RMN playing to your vanity like that.
by JohnMatuszakloveschunk on Apr 21, 2011 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Call me a hater,
or a “small Hall of Fame guy” or whatever.
but the induction of Clarence Gilbert is, for me, the definitive sign that The Rafters have grown too crowded.
Clarence Gilbert is exactly the type of player who should be the “first athlete out” of the Mizzou HoF. I can’t remember a player more exciting when he was on, but neither can I remember one more frustrating when he was off. And he was off too often to be a HoF’er, in my opinion. Career FG%: 37.5.
by nycbirdo on Apr 21, 2011 10:12 AM CDT reply actions 2 recs
Yep. I'm with you.
Good, streaky shooter? Yes. Pretty good defender? Yes. Hall of Famer? No way.
by u2nspenserfan on Apr 21, 2011 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions
Part of the problem
Is that we haven’t had a lot of “transcendental” players over the last 10-20 years. I mean, there was Kareem Rush, who was electrifying, and Demarre Carroll, who wasn’t necessarily “great” but played his heart out and got the job done on a consistent basis. Guys like Keeyon Dooling and Linas Kleiza would’ve easily been Rafters guys if they hadn’t bolted so early for the NBA (I still had Dooling ahead of Gilbert on my list). I put Gilbert second in my voting, although in retrospect it’s partially because he was part of the wave of players when I first really started to pay heavy attention to Mizzou basketball. Familiarity trumped reason, in a way.
Another issue is the separating the Rafters into different eras. If given the opportunity, there were at least three or four guys from earlier years that I would’ve voted ahead of anyone from the last two classes. The reason Gilbert gets in, though, is probably because of his “grit” and the fact that, when he was on, he could carry the Tigers to victory. Unfortunately, he wa more of a “Mr. Any Shot” than a true “Mr. Big Shot.”
Bingo.
Gilbert gets in because Rush is already in, and for sentimental value.
by JohnMatuszakloveschunk on Apr 21, 2011 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Yep
Clarence Gilbert has no business being in any hall of fame, except maybe Overshooters Unanonymous.
Also, the time period thing is kind of bogus
Fallow periods lead to undeserving candidates in the big picture.
Now that we've established multiple players from each "era"...
…we might change our tiers in the future, but…from the opening post in the series…
Does this, like our Wall of Excellence, skew toward recent history? Yeah. But this isn’t a poll to choose the five best Mizzou players of all-time (there’s no point to that anyway — Michael Atchison already created the definitive list) — it is an attempt to recognize both the present and past in a way that generates conversation for RMN readers.
We have an incredible range of ages that read this site and participate—The Rafters was, in part, an effort to make sure that each age group gets to talk about players they got to follow…
True
We “haters” can get over ourselves now.
Regardless, Gilbert didn’t even make my top 3 for this era.
your rafters need not include him
I have Wesley Stokes 1, Jason Horton 2 and Najeeb Echollz 3.
Oh shut up, I was already leaving.
Wesley Stokes
When does his hair get inducted into the rafters?
Some people say "hate" is a strong word. If you're talking about kansas, it's not strong enough.
Did Clarence make it over Thames?
Because I kinda disagree with that. But I’ll accept it. I’ll eat my meat so I can have my pudding, per se.
#4 4ever.
One of my all-time favorites. He could light it up. You can’t hit a shot you don’t take.
yeah,
but that’s what the lottery tells you, as well. “can’t win if you don’t play.” some nights gilbert played the lottery way too much.
"Bob Gibson pitches as though he's double parked."~Vin Scully
by threadkiller on Apr 21, 2011 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions
I think people are overstating how often he shot us out of games.
I think more often he kept us in games we had no business being in. Not an all time great, but a great.
by JohnMatuszakloveschunk on Apr 21, 2011 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions

by 


























