clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

What If...Jeremy Maclin Hadn't Injured His Knee in 2006?

Exploring the impact of Jeremy Maclin’s knee injury as a true freshman. How would a healthy Maclin have impacted the 2006 team and into 2007 and 2008?

Nebraska-Missouri Photo by Jim Barcus/Kansas City Star/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

This was originally posted January 13th and January 14th (a TWO Parter!), 2009. Bill frequently ran these “What If...” posts during his time running Rock M Nation, and since it’s “What if...” week at it made sense to re-up a few of Bill’s great posts from back in the early years of RockM. —Sam

Even though we knew Jeremy Maclin's Friday announcement of his pro intentions was coming, it's still sparked a small wave of nostalgia. It's a shame that the guy was quite likely the best wide receiver in Missouri history only played on Faurot Field for two years. It's hard not to wish for at least a third year. And while there was obviously little to no likelihood of his coming back for 2009, we were really gypped out of another year: 2006.

So let's put on our "What If..." cap for a bit. In 2006, Missouri flew out of the gates at 6-0 and stumbled a bit down the stretch, but still ended up exceeding preseason expectations with an 8-5 campaign. They were a pleasant surprise overall, but they struggled at times, especially against Iowa State, when pretty much every receiver on the team other than Tommy Saunders limped off the field at some point, and a last-second comeback attempt fell short. What if Chase Daniel had had Maclin to throw to that day...or any other? What would that have done for the 2006 squad? And if it would have helped that squad (as we know it would have), would it have helped recruiting too? Jeremy Maclin's legacy is already deep and well-defined, but what if Mizzou really had gotten three seasons out of him? What if...Jeremy Maclin hadn't injured his knee on July 25, 2006?


I didn't necessarily believe the reports at the time--that Jeremy Maclin was tearing up summer practices, and that there was no way Missouri would be able to keep him off the field in '06. It seems the main goal of the practice reports you read are to pump you up for the fall. Knowing what I know now, I'd say they were probably pretty damn accurate. Knowing what I know now, the odds of his starting the season high on the depth chart were astronomical.

Week 1 Depth Chart With Maclin
Will Franklin (Jr)
Brad Ekwerekwu (Sr)
Tommy Saunders (So)
Jared Perry (Fr)
Danario Alexander (Fr)
Jason Ray (Jr)
Greg Bracey (Jr)
Will Franklin (Jr)
Jeremy Maclin (Fr)
Brad Ekwerekwu (Sr)
Tommy Saunders (So)
Jared Perry (Fr)
Danario Alexander (redshirting)
Jason Ray (Jr)
Greg Bracey (Jr)

If memory serves, Perry was too impressive to redshirt more-or-less from the get-go, but Alexander was a late decision. With Maclin dominating, I think the staff would have decided not to play all three true freshmen, and Alexander would have donned the red. Ekwerekwu had appendix surgery toward the end of August, and his status for starting in Week One was a bit uncertain for a while. This uncertainty, plus the likelihood that Maclin really was that good as a true freshman, would have resulted in two St. Louis natives atop the WR list.

So here's the next question: how much would Maclin have contributed? Let's do this: let's look at what percentage of overall Mizzou WR catches he nabbed in 2007 as a redshirt freshman and apply it to 2006.

(And if you couldn't care less about the data, just skip down to the "2006: Old vs New" table after the jump.)

Catches by 2007 Mizzou WRs
WR Catches % of all
Jeremy Maclin
80 34.6%
Will Franklin 49 21.2%
Tommy Saunders 41 17.7%
Danario Alexander 37 16.0%
Jared Perry 13 5.6%
Jason Ray 8 3.5%
Greg Bracey 3 1.3%

Let's look at how the distribution was in 2006 without Maclin:

Catches by 2006 Mizzou WRs
WR Catches % of all
Will Franklin 48 28.9%
Jared Perry 37 22.3%
Brad Ekwerekwu 32 19.3%
Tommy Saunders 25 15.1%
Danario Alexander 15 9.0%
Jason Ray 6 3.6%
Greg Bracey 3 1.8%

Now let's look at how Chase Daniel's tendencies changed from 2006 (without Maclin) to 2007 (with him). This will actually be quite telling, as there was almost no personnel change in the WR/TE unit from '06 to '07--they just replaced Ek in '06 with Maclin in '07.

Completions by Position, 2006-07
2006 2007
Position Completions % of Comp. Completions % of Comp.
Wide Receivers 166 57.0% 231 58.6%
Tight Ends 111 38.1% 136 34.5%
Running Backs 14 4.9% 27 6.9%

Obviously not a lot changed as far as Daniel's pass distribution numbers are concerned.

One last thing we need to look at: Chase Daniel's overall numbers.

Season Comp Attempts Yards TD INT Comp % Yds Per Pass Yds Per Comp
2006 287 452 3527 28 10 63.5% 7.80 12.29
2007 384 563 4306 33 11 68.2% 7.65 11.21

The first thing to notice is, Daniel's per-pass and per-completion numbers actually went down in 2007 with Maclin in the rotation. I wouldn't have guessed that. Looking at the numbers, you really can't say Daniel's yards-per numbers would have changed all that much with Maclin. And while his INT rate improved (2.2% in 2006, 2.0% in 2007), Daniel's natural maturation process has to account for some of that.

So basically the only thing that might have changed is completion percentage. Daniel's completion % went up 4.7%, from 63.5 to 68.2, between 2006 and 2007. Again, a lot of that has to be attributed to maturation. But all? If he's throwing to Maclin instead of Brad Ekwerekwu, Saunders instead of Perry, Perry instead of Alexander, wouldn't his % have gone up at least a smidge? We're going to say yes. A smidge. We're going to say that with Maclin, Daniel's 2006 completion rate would have been 65.1%. That assigns 1/3 of his rate improvement to better options, 2/3 to maturation.

So now let's work backwards.

  • 65.1% of 452 passes = 294 completions, an improvement of 7 balls. Other passers (Brandon Coleman, Tommy Saunders, Brad Ekwerekwu, Chase Coffman) still account for a 4-for-13, 63 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT line. So now there are 298 passes completed in the 2006 season.
    57.0% of those completions go to WRs = 170 WR receptions (along with 114 TE receptions and still 14 RB receptions). With Alexander out of the mix and Maclin now in, here is the pass distribution for 2006, using unadjusted per-catch averages:
Player Catches Yards Est. TDs
Jeremy Maclin 59 779 6.6
Will Franklin 35 605 4.4
Jared Perry 27 313 2.2
Brad Ekwerekwu 24 323 1.5
Tommy Saunders 18 195 1.4
Jason Ray 4 33 0.0
Greg Bracey 3 79 1.0
TOTAL WR 170 2,327 17.1
All Tight Ends 114 1,180 14.4
All Running Backs 14 102 0.0
TOTAL 298 3,609 31.5

Or, for means of comparison...

Season Comp Attempts Yards TD INT Comp % Yds Per Pass Yds Per Comp
Old 2006 287 452 3527 28 10 63.5% 7.80 12.29
New 2006 298 452 3609 31.5 10 65.9% 7.98 12.11
Diff +11 +0 +82 +3.5 +0 +2.4% +0.18 -0.18

So having Maclin in the receiving corps resulted in the following:

  • An extra 6.3 yards per game passing
  • An extra 1.9 points per game from the passing game (3.5 TDs). We'll apply those points randomly, basically letting them accumulate and cashing them in. Meaning, we'll say Missouri scored an extra touchdown in the fourth game of the season, the 8th, and the 11th game, and an extra field goal in the 13th. I'm not going to automatically say "We'd have scored these TDs in the games we lost," or anything like that. Let's apply the points in random fashion.

So...what about the return game? Well, we can do this one of two ways. We can either compare his return averages to the 2006 return averages (Goldsmith/Woods on KRs, Saunders on PRs) and add the difference to each return...or we can keep it random and say that the returns would have stayed basically the same, aside from the three return TDs he had (a punt return against Illinois in Game #1, a punt return against Illinois State in Game #4, a kickoff return against Kansas State in Game #11). Because this post is already getting longer than I had intended, let's go with random again. Let's apply an extra TD to those three games--#1, #4, #11.

So in the end, we are basically adding points to the following games.

  • Punt return TD in Game #1
  • Receiving TD, Punt return TD in Game #4
  • Receiving TD in Game #8
  • Receiving TD in Game #11, Kickoff return TD in Game #11
  • Field Goal in Game #13

Did you like how we mixed intricate data with total randomness? Me too.

2006: Old vs New
Old 2006 New 2006
Opponent W/L MU Opp W/L MU Opp Record Conf. Rec.
Murray State W 47 7 W 54 7 1-0
Ole Miss W 34 7 W 34 7 2-0
@ New Mexico W 27 17 W 27 17 3-0
Ohio U. W 31 6 W 45 6 4-0
Colorado W 28 13 W 28 13 5-0 1-0
@ Texas Tech W 38 21 W 38 21 6-0 2-0
@ Texas A&M L 19 25 L 19 25 6-1 2-1
Kansas State W 41 21 W 48 21 7-1 3-1
Oklahoma L 10 26 L 10 26 7-2 3-2
@ Nebraska L 20 34 L 20 34 7-3 3-3
@ Iowa State L 16 21 W 30 21 8-3 4-3
Kansas W 42 17 W 42 17 9-3 5-3
Oregon State L 38 39 W 41 39 10-3

We all remember 2006. There were three "coulda woulda shoulda" games for Missouri--@ATM, @ISU, and vs Oregon State. We could easily say that the ball Will Franklin fumbled at the 1 against ATM would have gone to Maclin, and Maclin was faster and would have scored, and Mizzou would have won. We could even say that the inside screen against Nebraska that was a bit too high and Franklin volleyed right to Adam Carriker...that coulda gone to Maclin too, and he would have just caught it, and that could have prevented Missouri from falling behind 17-0. Hell, we could even say that a couple of the picks Chase Daniel threw against OU wouldn't have been going to lesser receivers, and that they might not have happened.

But we're just not going to go there. With all the injuries that took place against Iowa State (Franklin got hurt in Q1, and Coffman, Rucker and Ekwerekwu had all hobbled off the field by Q4), I'm confident in saying Mizzou would have won that game with Maclin running routes for four quarters, and in a Sun Bowl that Mizzou could have won had any of about seven different plays not gone against them, one extra Mizzou weapon could have made the difference there. For grins, we'll say a 2006 team with Maclin still loses four of five in the middle of the season, but rights the ship down the stretch and goes 10-3, winning its second straight bowl game.

So what does that do to recruiting?

2007 Recruiting Class

The 2007 Recruiting Class was full of what if's. Two Rock Bridge products--QB Logan Gray and TE Aron White--ended up signing with Georgia. Hazelwood Central QB Marvin McNutt went to Iowa. Blue Springs OT Donald Stephenson went to Oklahoma. Four-star Hazelwood West ATH LaMark Brown went to K-State. It wasn't Missouri's best job of sealing the borders. Would Missouri's first 10-win season in decades have changed that?

Probably not. Gray and White were both locked up by Georgia in September. McNutt committed over the summer. Stephenson would have likely gone to OU no matter what. Brown supposedly wavered on his commitment for a little while in December, but it was all rumors for all we know. So Missouri's strong performance probably would have come along too late in the recruiting game to affect much. Really, only a couple of late prospects' minds might have been changed.

Their names? William Cole...and Dezmon Briscoe.

It could have happened, you know.

As a whole, Gary Pinkel has done very well in recruiting against Mark Mangino. A quick scouring of the Rivals database shows the following (and yes, this is highly inexact):

Class KU signees with MU offer MU signees with KU offer
2003 3 - Lyonel Anderson, Brandon McAnderson, John Randle 6 - Marcus Woods, Jason Ray, Josh Barbo, Tyler Luellen, Emmanuel Phillips, Lorenzo Williams
2004 1 - Mike Rivera 1 - Aaron Saunders
2005 1 - Justin Thornton 6 - Chase Coffman, James Stigall, Tarell Corby, Jaron Baston, Chad Washington, Kurtis Gregory
2006 1 - Phil Strozier 1 - Jared Perry
2007 1 - Dezmon Briscoe 4 - Derrick Washington, Jayson Palmgren, Michael Keck, Chris Earnhardt
2008 0 7 - Blaine Gabbert, Andrew Jones, Dan Hoch, Aldon Smith, Kip Edwards, Zaviar Gooden, Jimmy Burge
2009* 0 5 - Alex Sanders, Jack Meiners, Brayden Burnett, Joshua Tatum, TJ Moe

* To date

And yes, take these numbers with a large grain of salt. They represent only the data that Rivals collected—there could be tons of other recruits who either a) never reported an offer from one school or the other, or b) never reported much (if any) interested in one school or the other. This is only a list of recruits who reported offers from and interest in each school, then chose one or the other.
Like I said, Gary Pinkel has a pretty darn good track record against Mark Mangino. In the last 6.5 recruiting classes (counting 2009 as .5 so far), Mizzou has inked 30 kids with Kansas offers/interest, while Kansas has signed just 7 with Mizzou offers/interest. That’s about an 81% success rate for Pinkel there.

And while McAnderson or Rivera or Thornton might have been valuable pieces to the Mizzou puzzle, one name on the KU side of the ledger stands out.

Two years ago, Dezmon Briscoe was a 3-star WR from Cedar Hill, TX, who was playing second fiddle to teammates William Cole and Romie Blaylock. Missouri was recruiting Cole and Briscoe, and as their recruitment picked up in January 2007, they both had a late-January visit scheduled to Columbia. But after an early-January visit to Lawrence, Briscoe committed to KU. He still planned on making said visit to Columbia, but it didn’t end up coming to fruition for whatever reason (KU talking him out of taking other visits, Cole committing to OSU and Mizzou losing interest in Briscoe, whatever).

At the time, Cole seemed to be the big prize. He was a 4-star kid, Rivals’ #14 player from Texas. For a while, it seemed that Mizzou was pursuing Cole and Briscoe as a package deal. Cole did indeed commit to OSU, where he’s done next to nothing in two years, and I’ll be honest—as a follower of recruitment and Rivals subscriber, I’d have been a hair disappointed if we’d missed out on Cole but ended up with Briscoe anyway. I’d have considered him something of an afterthought. But that tells you everything you know about people who follow recruiting rankings too closely.

So for fun, let’s say this happened:

  1. Spurred on by the extra interest generated from Missouri’s 10-3 season, Cole and Briscoe do indeed visit in late-January.
  2. After the visit, they end up committing to Mizzou, in part to become “the next Jeremy Maclin.”
  3. They take the scholarships that ended up going to Donte Neal and Jason Townson (who didn’t qualify anyway) a week(ish) later.

How does this seemingly minor recruiting development change the trajectory of both Missouri and Kansas in 2007, 2008, and beyond?


Missouri v Kansas

Here’s a look at what the WR Depth Chart might have looked at at the beginning of 2007:

Real Week 1 Depth Chart With Briscoe & Cole

Will Franklin (Sr)
Jeremy Maclin (RSFr)
Tommy Saunders (Jr)
Jared Perry (So)
Danario Alexander (So)
Jason Ray (Sr)
Greg Bracey (Sr)

Jeremy Maclin (So)
Will Franklin (Sr)
Tommy Saunders (Jr)
Jared Perry (So)
Danario Alexander (RSFr)
Dezmon Briscoe (Fr)
Jason Ray (Sr)
William Cole (Fr)
Greg Bracey (Sr)

Remember, Cole was the big prize of the two new recruits, and great things would have been expected of him. He technically “played” at OSU his freshman year (if you can call it that), rushing one time for three yards and catching two passes for seven yards, and we’ll say he looked just impressive and athletic enough in August to play as a true freshman.

Meanwhile, you know Briscoe would have played. His season trajectory at Kansas followed that of a lot of impact freshmen—he didn’t necessarily thrive early on (though he was certainly solid), but he got better and better as the season progressed. His season peaked against Nebraska and Missouri. Against the Huskers in KU’s epic 76-39 route, he caught three touchdown passes; against Mizzou, he caught seven for 94 yards, including his “here I am, world” moment, a sprawled out, diving 34-yard catch in the second quarter.

At Mizzou, he’d have been fifth in line behind four established guys (including two future pros at least) and a second-year Danario instead of third or fourth in line behind Marcus Henry, Dexton Fields and Kerry Meier. He’d have likely had the same type of “steady performance, with a couple big late-season moments” season, eventually passing Alexander (maybe) and Perry (definitely) on the depth chart.

But in the end, Briscoe’s presence at Mizzou likely doesn’t change much of anything in 2007, for either Kansas or Mizzou.


In their 11-0 start, Kansas won three games by one possession or less—a 30-24 win over K-State in Manhattan, a 19-14 win over Colorado in Boulder, and a 19-11 win over Texas A&M in College Station. In only one other game (Oklahoma State) did they win by less than 30.

In the wins over Colorado and ATM, Briscoe managed just 49 yards receiving—a very replaceable figure.

Really, the only KU win that might have been questionable without Briscoe was against K-State. In Manhattan, Briscoe caught a 28-yard touchdown pass in the third quarter to put KU up 21-14. In a 30-24 win, that touchdown was clearly very important, but KU likely would have still won for three reasons. First, they were already creeping into field goal range, and if the rest of the game had played out the same, a field goal from that possession would have sufficed. Second, the touchdown was a perfectly-executed bubble screen (seen at about 1:52 of this video) that anybody else, Dexton Fields or whoever, likely would have scored on. Third, even if the play doesn’t work without Briscoe, it was first down, and KU had plenty more options to move down and score. So we’ll say that a Briscoe-less KU team is still undefeated when they head to Arrowhead on November 24, 2007.


Meanwhile, heading into Arrowhead, Mizzou would have still been 10-1. In their one loss—in Norman—Chase Daniel threw for 361 yards. Danario Alexander had six catches for 54 yards in the game, and there’s only one play where Briscoe might have made a difference: in the fourth quarter, after OU had gone up 35-24, Alexander caught a 34-yard pass over the middle, cut back, and almost went the distance, but was shoelace tackled. Mizzou had to punt three plays later. While Alexander may be faster in terms of straight-line speed, Briscoe’s more agile and could have made the cutback faster. But...even if that would have happened, the result would have been the same.

Honestly, the Mizzou or Kansas result that might have changed is the game at Arrowhead, and only in the sense that Mizzou might have won more easily. It was already 21-0 Mizzou when Briscoe made his presence felt with the 34-yard, diving catch. Without Briscoe, that play doesn’t happen. Of course, Kansas could have scored again anyway, but they’d have taken more time, and the game would have played out differently down the stretch. We’ll say that instead of 36-28 Mizzou victory, it’s more like 34-21.

Either way, Mizzou moves to #1 in the BCS rankings, loses to OU, stomps Arkansas, and finishes #4 in the country at 12-2. Briscoe didn’t have a huge Orange Bowl, so KU probably would have beaten Virginia Tech anyway. In other words, nothing changes.

Would back-to-back 10-win seasons and a Top 5 finish have changed anything in recruiting?

2008 Recruiting Class

Alamo Bowl Photo by Jim Barcus/Kansas City Star/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

Again, the answer is probably not. Mizzou’s 2008 recruiting class was almost a best-case scenario the way things played out. Mizzou landed seven of the Top 10 kids in the state, eight of the Top 12. While the season didn’t start out well—Blaine Gabbert committed to Nebraska, Wes Kemp to Wisconsin—it finished up just fine. If anything, maybe these guys just commit earlier. Maybe they don’t flirt with other schools as much. (And maybe Dan Hoch doesn’t end up at Mizzou because Gabbert hadn’t befriended him first as a Nebraska commit.) It’s possible that sustained success and the promise of a big-time 2008 season could have landed some bigger Texas recruits, but Mizzou wasn’t really in on any of the really big ones, so we’re not going to jump to that conclusion.

2008 Season

So now we move on to the 2008 season. Expectations probably wouldn’t have been higher with Briscoe and an underachieving Cole in the mix at WR, but let’s just say they wouldn’t have been any lower. Plus, with Briscoe and an underachieving Cole in the mix, the odds are that neither Michael Egnew nor Wes Kemp would have seen their redshirts come off in ‘08.

Real Week 1 Depth Chart The new, pretty alt. reality

Jeremy Maclin (So)
Tommy Saunders (Sr)
Danario Alexander (Jr - Inj.)
Jared Perry (Jr)
Jerrell Jackson (Fr)
Earl Goldsmith (Sr)
Michael Egnew (Fr)
Wes Kemp (Fr)

Jeremy Maclin (Jr)
Tommy Saunders (Sr)
Dezmon Briscoe (So)Danario Alexander (So - Inj.)
Jared Perry (Jr)
William Cole (So)*Jerrell Jackson (Fr)
Earl Goldsmith (Sr)
Michael Egnew (Fr) - redshirting
Wes Kemp (Fr) - redshirting

* There’s a chance that Cole would have moved to DB by now.

Being that Missouri only lost four games in ‘08, let’s look at those four games and see which, if any, would have seen different results with the emergence of Briscoe as a big-time threat.

Oklahoma State

To judge what kind of an impact Briscoe could have had on this game, we should look at the contributions made by the guys who would have been below Briscoe on the depth chart. Against OSU, Alexander, Perry and Goldsmith combined for 7 catches, 44 yards, and 1 TD. Alexander was also the one who stumbled on a crossing route and had the ball bounce off his helmet and into the waiting arms of Ricky Price. It was such a fluky play that you almost have to think that fate would have made that dumb luck happen no matter what, but if you’re not a believer in fate and dumb luck, then you’ll probably assume that if Briscoe is running that route, the ball is not only not intercepted, but it’s completed for a first down inside OSU’s red zone. The team overall seemed to lose its mojo in this game, and maybe this game was destined to be a loss, but...Dez Briscoe is really, really good. If he’s on the field, and Mizzou has more than two reliable weapons (Coffman and Maclin had 19 catches for 224 yards, and the rest of the team offered little to nothing)...I’m sorry, but Mizzou wins this game. They just do. We’ll say they win 31-28, setting up a #1 vs #2 matchup versus Texas the next week (remember how close we were to that?).

(I just hope you don’t remember this post. Before The Beef was quadruple jinxing the wrestling team, I was jinxing the football team.)


Obviously the way Texas played that night against Missouri, there’s nothing Dez Briscoe was going to be able to do to change the result. But I’ll say one thing: Briscoe’s big game this year came that weekend against a hungover OU team. Like, 12 catches for 269 yards and 2 TDs...that big. There’s no way Mizzou comes close to winning this game, it would have been closer. We’ll say Mizzou falls something like 49-38 or 56-38 instead of 56-31. That’s a little more respectable, right? Either way, Mizzou once again stays one week at #1 then falters...though the way Texas played that night, an all-star team of Mizzou greats probably wouldn’t have taken them out.


So Mizzou is now 6-1 instead of 5-2 after the Texas loss. They still proceed to win their next four games—CU, @BU, KSU, @ISU—before heading to Arrowhead at 10-1 and still technically harboring national title hopes if they can beat Kansas and Oklahoma and get a lot of help from other teams losing.

And here are my two questions for you:

1) Would Missouri have been held to 7 points in 29 minutes if Dez Briscoe were dressed in gold and black instead of blue and white? Answer: maybe.

2) Would Kansas have scored 40 points without Briscoe’s 9 catches, 115 yards, and 1 TD? Answer: hell no. Dexton Fields is a good WR, but without Briscoe, Kerry Meier is given the #1 WR treatment and Todd Reesing just doesn’t have enough weapons to pull this off. So in this game, Briscoe actually hurts KU more than he helps MU, but either way...this is a win. Mizzou moves to 11-1 and a ranking somewhere between #6 and #9...maybe higher, depending, I guess, on how badly they had actually ended up losing to Texas.


And Mizzou still gets smoked by OU. Instead of 62-21, we’ll say it’s something like 62-24 or 62-28, but...smoked is smoked. Mizzou finishes 11-2.

Bowl Game

A win over Oklahoma State and a 11-2 record pretty much assures Missouri of a Holiday Bowl date against Oregon. Texas Tech still would have ended up in the Cotton Bowl no matter what, but Mizzou definitely would have been next in line. I want to <em>think</em> Mizzou would have won that game, as Oregon’s offense (run run run) plays to Mizzou’s strengths (stop the run), but the way an apparently injured Chase Daniel played in the Alamo Bowl, I don’t know. We’ll say Mizzou loses and finishes 11-3, wrapping up a 3-year run that included a 33-8 record, two bowl wins, two North titles, maybe one more week at #1...and possibly Dez Briscoe in black and gold.


In the end, three years of Jeremy Maclin would have meant more wins, as you see here, but really not that much of a boost in recruiting. I don’t think this year’s recruiting effort would have been any more or less successful, and the only potential positive impact Maclin’s extra year would have had long-term would have been a younger, more talented and athletic receiver corps after his departure (the ‘09 WR corps would have had Briscoe, perpetually underachieving Cole, a junior Danario Alexander, and redshirt freshmen Wes Kemp and Michael Egnew). While the three (or so) extra wins would have been nice, in the end what we were gypped out of the most when we lost Jeremy Maclin for the 2006 season was...more Maclin moments.

Maybe we end up with Briscoe and/or Cole...maybe we land somebody else, and maybe that leads to more success in the future...but clearly all of that is uncertain. Hell, maybe we wouldn’t have landed Dan Hoch...maybe Will Franklin would have declared for the draft a year earlier because he wasn’t the clear #1 heading into 2007. We have no idea. We do know that we wouldn’t have won any more North titles than we did, and our program overall would still be looking at a rebuild/reload situation in 2009.

But we were deprived of a couple more big returns, probably 50-80 more catches, a handful of ridiculously amazing runs after catch, a handful of broken receiver records (career yards, career TDs, all-purpose yards)...and probably a 3-time All-American. Whether the on-field success would have been much better than it actually was, who knows...but it sure would have been worth it to watch him in black and gold for one more year.