FanPost

Why The Tigers Can Go Dancing in Year 1 of The Let Dennis Cook Era


Coach Dennis Gates has set the Mizzou Interwebs ablaze with his torrid recruiting pace, spawning a new memevent to Let Dennis Cook.

It’s no surprise. The dude has brought in a whopping 7 new players and counting:

  • PG - Sean East
  • CG - Tre Gomillion
  • Wing - D’Moi Hodge
  • Wing - DeAndre (Dree) Gholston
  • SF - Aiden Shaw
  • CF - Noah Carter
  • C - Mohammed Diarra

But a lot of people are wondering: is this crop of transfers actually any better than last year’s nine newcomers via the transfer portal and freshman class? I strongly believe it is for three key reasons:

  • Point Guard is the most important position in basketball
  • Defense translates & wins games at the college level
  • Mizzou should be a better 3pt shooting team

Let’s get it.

Point Guard is the Most Important Position in College Basketball — We Got a Good One

You see it every year in the NCAA tournament. Massive upsets of top teams at the hands of tiny schools like Saint Peter’s, Oral Roberts and Florida Gulf Coast University - Dunk City, Dunk Dunk City, anyone?

What do nearly all major NCAA tournament upsets have in common? Exceptional guard play, specifically point guard play.

Yes, it’s usually mixed in with sweet shooting from 3pt land and at least one or two athletic bigs, usually the unheralded, with a chip on their shoulder kind. But far and away the most important component is the point guard, the (cue Bill Raftery voice) little guy with the blow-by.

This year, Mizzou has Sean East; last year, it lacked any true point guard. If nothing else changed, that might be enough to win 5 games. Here’s why.

A solid PG can take over a game, even against a superior opponent, because he touches the ball nearly every possession, and there just aren’t that many possessions in the college game.

  • NBA median 106.6 possessions per game
  • NCAA D1 median 70.1 possessions per game

*All numbers courtesy of teamrankings.com

That’s a gigantic difference.

That means there are 36.5 fewer opportunities to score; it’s basically a full 33% less possessions per game. The difference in number of possessions almost completely explains the difference in total scoring in NBA games vs. college games.

  • NBA median points per game 110.7
  • NBA median Point Per Possession 1.0925
  • NCAA D1 median points per game 69.8
  • NCAA D1 median points per possession .998

NBA teams are about 9 percent more efficient than NCAA D1 teams, scoring about 1.1 points per possession to the NCAA teams’ 1 point per possession. But 95% of the difference in scoring between college and the NBA — 40 points — is simply due to the college game having fewer possessions.

That’s less shots for deadeye 3pt shooters, fewer touches for big men in the paint, and a massive outsized importance for the few elite PGs who can control the tempo and flow of a game and handle the rock.

Valuing the basketball matters in the college game - a lot. And last year, the Tigers turned it over on a whopping 21.1 percent of possessions, ‘good’ for 338th out of 358 teams. In a game with only 70 possessions, turning it over 15 times a game is a recipe to lose. And while the median team in the country turned it over on 18.1 percent of its possessions, the average tourney team only turned it over on about 15 percent of its possessions. This was a massive black hole for Mizzou.

Worse, the team didn’t come close to making up for it anywhere else:

  • Overall offensive efficiency - .936 points per possession, 296th
  • Defensive efficiency - 1.026 points per possession, 252nd
  • Effective Field Goal Percentage (shots + free throw scoring) - 47.1%, 296th
  • Opponent Effective Field Goal Percentage - 50.8%, 217th
  • Total Rebounding percentage - 50.9%, 129th
  • Offensive rebounding percentage - 29.6%, 77th
  • Defensive rebounding percentage - 72.9%, 224th

So to tell the story, Mizzou turned the ball over an insane amount, shot poorly and allowed its opponents to score way too much. They managed to grab a few more rebounds per game than their opponents on the offensive glass but not nearly enough to make up for all the other holes in their game, including defensive rebounding. Bottom line, in the college game, the point guard runs the offense, touches the ball on nearly every possession, and there aren’t enough possessions in a game to turn the ball over a ton and win — especially if you’re not great in any other area of the game.

Enter Sean East

The Tigers’ new point guard addition had a fantastic 2.8 assist to turnover ratio last season, including only 2 turnovers/game. East also sported a usage of 28%, in line with a ball-dominant true PG.

By contrast, Mizzou’s "PG" Jarron ‘Boogie’ Coleman, turned it over 2.7 times/game with a <1 assist/turnover ratio - he actually turned it over more than he generated assists. Amari Davis, Mizzou’s other "PG" was even worse. 1.3 turnovers to 1.1 assists/game. Mizzou’s third stringer, freshman Kaleb Brown, fared a tad better at 1.1 assists to .9 turnovers. But as you can see, East absolutely blows away all three, and his film is impressive. He can create off the bounce, generate buckets for other guys and score from distance, mid-range and around the rim. He’s a true PG who can get his shot too.

There’s every reason to believe that at the college game’s most important position, Mizzou has a major upgrade, one who can cut turnovers down to 15% of possessions, buying the Tigers 5 extra possessions a game and potentially another 5 points a game by running the offense effectively. That’s enough to have scored 5 extra points/game and won 5 games for the Tigers this past season decided by fewer than 5 points.

Defense Translates at Any Level and Has Outsized Importance in CBB

Scouts will tell you the skill that most directly and quickly translates up a level is defense. As mentioned earlier, Mizzou struggled mightily on defense last year:

  • Avg. NCAA D1 Defensive Efficiency - .997 points per possession
  • Mizzou’s Defensive Efficiency - 1.026 points per possession, 252nd

That’s a full 3 percent extra points per possession than the average team.

You might say who cares about defense in basketball? But just as with the importance of the point guard position, the number of possessions in college games places outsized importance on defense vs. the NBA. Consider it this way:

In the NBA, with 106.5 possessions/game, players get 6 fouls. In college, with 70 possessions/game, they get 5. That’s 33% fewer possessions and only 14% fewer fouls to give per player. On top of that, college players only make 71% of their free throws to the NBA’s 77%.

So if we add it all up, the numbers tell you:

  • There are fewer possessions in college
  • Players effectively have more fouls to give
  • And there’s less of a punishment for fouling

So playing hard, effective defense, even if it means fouling a lot, is a way to win in the college game. If Mizzou could bring in some plus defenders, that could add up to some wins, especially considering defense translates between levels.

Enter D’Moi Hodge, Tre Gomillion and DeAndre ‘Dree Gholston. All three are plus defenders, long and athletic, with strong lateral quickness and agility. Hodge and Gomillion each won Defensive Player of the Year Awards in their conference the past 2 seasons. Playing under Chef Gates himself.

If the additions of these three mean Mizzou can simply get to average defensively, Mizzou could give up 3 percent fewer points per possession, or about 2 points fewer per game playing at an average pace.

Pure 3pt Shooting Should Improve

This one isn’t hard. Missouri was one of the absolute worst 3pt shooting teams last season:

  • Mizzou hit only 28.1 percent from downtown, 354th in the country
  • The average team hit 33.3% of its threes
  • Mizzou took 18.1 threes/game
  • The average NCAA team took 21.1 threes/game

Even if the team still only took 18 threes a game but made 6 of them, instead of taking 21 and making 7, that’s worth an extra 3 points/game.

Once again, enter Sean East. As a solid true PG, he actually shot more than 40% from 3 point land and would completely change the role of other players on the team, such as Boogie Coleman. Free from ball-handling responsibilities, Boogie can focus on catch-and-shoot situations and being a 3 pt specialist. With Hodge & Gomillion eating up tough defensive assignments, he could also be free from being exposed defensively and more rested on the offensive end. It’s not much of a squint to see these changes pushing Boogie back to the 36% 3pt shooting percentage he carried before joining Mizzou. Add Diarra’s 3pt shooting, and all of a sudden, Mizzou is a competent to average 3 pt shooting team.

10 Points/Game Better: The Let Dennis Cook Blueprint

All told, simply from better PG play and modest improvements in defense and 3pt shooting, Mizzou should be a dramatically better team next season.

  • Reduce turnovers from 21.1 percent of possessions to 15 percent of possessions: + 5 points/game
  • Shoot 33% from downtown: + 3 points/game
  • Defend at an average rate of .0997 points/possession, down from 1.026 points/possession: -2 opponent points/game

Add it all up, and that’s a 10 point/game improvement. Mizzou last year scored -6.2 points/game, 291st in the NCAA.

A 10-point swing to +3.8 points/game would move the Tigers up 200+ spots to 90th in the country… just below Dennis Gates’ Cleveland State team that won its conference. ;)


NCAA tourney teams Wisconsin, Colorado, Michigan, Miami, Michigan St. and St. Peter’s all reside in this neighborhood. That’s good enough to make the tournament and make a run vs. the right matchups in year 1 of the Let Dennis Cook era. What’s not to like about that?

MIZ!

FanPosts may be posted by any RMN member and may not reflect the views of the management staff of Rock M Nation or SB Nation.