clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

$hoe Companie$ play a pretty large role in the world college basketball

New, 30 comments

Shoe companies play a pretty large role in amateur athletics, especially in the world of high school and college basketball. We'll try to connect the dots a bit.

Thomas B. Shea-USA TODAY Sports

The big basketball news of the day yesterday happened when Rick Pitino, Hall of Fame worthy basketball coach and peddler of Adidas productsspoke up about how shoe companies impact recruiting. You may remember shortly after Louisville received a commitment from Antonio Blakeney, he backed out on his commitment only to spark this comment from 247Sports' Jerry Meyer:

Not sure if he expected it to happen, but that caused a minor explosion to twitter at the time. Coach Pitino's comments today however, caused a major explosion on twitter...

Many of the responses were over the over-dramatic type, as people are wont to unleash on Twitter (I admit, I favorited that last tweet because I thought it was funny), and few had actually listened to the context of what Pitino was saying. If you're interested in reading what he said, you can catch the transcript here, courtesy of the Louisville Courier-Journal. What Pitino was really trying to get to is the shoe companies' impact on summer basketball. Adidas and Nike fight it out for most of the AAU programs, and Under Armour and Reebok sponsor a few as well. When the shoe companies have contracts, that's how most of the AAU coaches get paid, and how the trips get paid for.

Needless to say, no one involved wants to see that relationship end, which is why some players may feel pressure to support those that have been supporting them. These players get closer to their AAU coaches, who are essentially making a living from these shoe company contracts. And certainly there are players who make their college decisions or professional shoe contract decisions based upon who take care of them and when. How often do you think that really happens? I mean, it's possible that it happened with the Antonio Blakeney situation, but it has to be something that's incredibly rare.

I went back and looked at where several Nike Schools and several Adidas schools got their players. I looked at Arizona, since they have the number 1 recruiting class so far in 2015, and Florida State (the #3 recruiting class) from the Nike Schools. Louisville (who despite Pitino's grumbling, have the #2 class as of now) and Kansas were my Adidas schools. Both KU and Louisville had no trouble landing top recruits from Nike programs, whether is was high school or AAU. After looking at what I had uncovered, I determined that it wasn't much to look at, so here's just L'ville and 'Zona over the last few years.

Shoe Company Chart

Click here to enlarge.

So what exactly is Rick Pitino talking about?

It is true that when players make the NBA, they sign a shoe contract. I'm not about to start the research on finding out whether a player's AAU team ends up playing a role in their later shoe contract, but I'd be willing to say it's a safe bet. However, the (albeit limited) evidence seems to show that their decision on where they go to college is not based upon who sponsored their AAU team.